[2004] KEHC 319 (KLR)
The court found that the defendant's driver was negligent, having driven at high speed and failed to keep a proper lookout for other road users, resulting in the fatal accident. The evidence of the plaintiff, who was an eyewitness, was preferred over the defendant's account, and the court rejected the claim that the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2004] KEHC 319 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Milka Nyanchoge Omambia (suing as the personal representative of Angira Omambia - deceased); Defendant: Gohil Soap Factory Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisii
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 154 of 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant for general damages; special damages claim dismissed; costs and interest awarded; 30 days stay of execution granted.
- Judges
- K Bauni
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Fatal Accidents, Vicarious Liability, Assessment of Damages
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Milka Nyanchoge Omambia (suing as the personal representative of Angira Omambia - deceased)
Plaintiff
Gohil Soap Factory Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant was negligent in causing the accident that resulted in the death of the deceased.
- 2 Whether the deceased contributed to the accident (contributory negligence).
- 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to special and general damages, and if so, in what quantum.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the defendant's driver was negligent, having driven at high speed and failed to keep a proper lookout for other road users, resulting in the fatal accident. The evidence of the plaintiff, who was an eyewitness, was preferred over the defendant's account, and the court rejected the claim that the deceased contributed to the accident. The defendant was held 100% liable, and as the driver was an employee, the defendant was vicariously liable. The court dismissed the claim for special damages due to lack of proof but awarded general damages for pain and suffering, loss of expectation of life, and loss of dependency, calculated based on the deceased's net income, age, and...
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant for general damages; special damages claim dismissed; costs and interest awarded; 30 days stay of execution granted.
Orders
- Defendant to pay plaintiff KES 10,000 for pain and suffering.
- Defendant to pay plaintiff KES 100,000 for loss of expectation of life.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
36 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA OF KISII
Civil Case 154 of 2002
MILKA NYANCHOGE OMAMBIA (suing as the
personal representative of ANGIRA OMAMBIA - DECEASED )…….. PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
GOHIL SOAP FACTORY LIMITED ………………………......……….. DEFENDANT
JUDGMENT:
Plaintiff MILKA NYACNCHOGE OMAMBIA has brought this suit on behalf of the Estate of her late husband ANGIRA OMAMBIA. She told court that on 9/1/2001 her husband was riding a bicycle along Ikonge-Ngoina road. Suddenly the defendant’s m/v Reg. No. KAG 695 K, which was being driven by KIMUTAI ARAP KOSKE (DW1), come from behind and hit the deceased. He died on the spot. PW1 told court that at the time she was near the road collecting firewood and she clearly witnessed the accident. Her husband was riding on the extreme left side of the road. The vehicle was moving at high speed and did not swerve to avoid the accident.
DW1 said he was the driver of the vehicle. He had taken soap with the vehicle, a lorry, to Nyamira from Nakuru. After off loading his cargo he started driving back. As he was approaching a corner he saw a cylist ahead riding in the same direction as he was driving. As he was passing the cylist, the cylist hit a pothole and lost control of the bicycle and moved to the right. DW1 swerved to the far left side to avoid him but he hit the front tyre of the lorry with his head. He said he was then driving at about 30 kph.
The first issue is that of liability. There is no dispute that the accident happened and Angira died. I find the evidence of his wife (PW1) to be candid and straightforward.
She was an eyewitness. She said her husband was riding on the extreme left. DW1 admitted that when he first saw the cylist indeed he was on the left side. PW1 said there was no hooting and the vehicle never swerved to the right. She also said it was on high speed. I believe she was telling the truth and the allegation of deceased hitting a pothole is not true. DW1 had said he had offloaded the vehicle of its cargo. It was therefore light. He was perhaps speeding to get back to Nakuru in time.
I therefore find that the driver of the defendant vehicle was negligent. He was driving at high speed and hit the deceased who was then riding on his proper lane. It is clear he did not keep a clear look out for other road users and thus caused the accident. I am not at all convinced that the deceased ever contributed to the accident. I find him 100% liable and since he was an employee of the defendant the defendant is consequently vicariously liable.
Plaintiff had claimed special damages of shs.5000/- coffin, shs.100/- abstract and shs.100/- death certificate. It is trite law that special damages should not only be pleaded but specifically proved. She did not give any documents to prove these claims. That claim of special damages therefore fails.
Plaintiff died on the spot. Even though he must have undergone certain amount of pain before he died. I will award shs.10,000/- for pain and suffering.
As for loss of expectation for life case law shows that an amount of shs.100,000/- will be fair and I award the same. He had some children and a wife whom he left behind.
PW1 said the deceased was a tea plucker, a farmer and a businessman and earned about shs.6000/- a month. She produced a pay slip from his employer showing that he earned shs.4,700/- per month and the net was shs.3,700/-.
In absence of any other evidence I will take the amount of shs.3,700/- as the correct figure he was earning per month.
Deceased was 40 years old when he died. It was submitted that the court should use a multiplier of 15 years by both the plaintiff and the defendant and I will adapt the same with dependency of 2/3. Thus sh.3,700 x 15 x 12 x 2/3 = shs. 444,000/=.
Thus I enter judgment for the plaintiff against the defendants as follows:-
1. Pain and suffering …………………………… shs. 10,000/-
2. Loss of expectation for life ……………………shs.100,000/-
3. Loss of dependency …………………………. shs.444,000/-
Total shs.554,000/-
The plaintiff will also have costs and interest.
Dated this 26th October 2004 at Kisii.
KABURU BAUNI
JUDGE
26/10/04
Mr. Onyancha for Mr. Onyango for the defendant
Mr. Onyango: I pray for 30 days stay of execution.
KABURU BAUNI
JUDGE
Order: There be 30 days of execution.
KABURU BAUNI
JUDGE