[2021] KEHC 7346 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 7346 (KLR)

The court found that the ex parte Applicant failed to comply with its directions by not filing an affidavit of service and not prosecuting the Chamber Summons dated 12th October 2020. This was the third instance of non-compliance by the applicant. In the absence of compliance and any response from the respondent,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 7346 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Milton Nyakundi Oriku; Respondent: The Sports Disputes Tribunal
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application E1116 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Non Compliance and Dismissal for Non Prosecution
Outcome
application dismissed for non-compliance and non-prosecution; case closed
Judges
P Nyamweya
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Mandamus Orders, Non Compliance With Court Orders
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Judicial Review Mandamus Orders Non Compliance With Court Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Milton Nyakundi Oriku

Applicant

The Sports Disputes Tribunal

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Non Compliance and Dismissal for Non Prosecution

  1. 1 Whether the ex parte Applicant complied with the Court's directions regarding service and filing of affidavits.
  2. 2 Whether the Chamber Summons dated 12th October 2020 should be dismissed for non-compliance and non-prosecution.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the ex parte Applicant failed to comply with its directions by not filing an affidavit of service and not prosecuting the Chamber Summons dated 12th October 2020. This was the third instance of non-compliance by the applicant. In the absence of compliance and any response from the respondent, the court exercised its discretion to dismiss the application for non-compliance and non-prosecution, marking the case as closed. The court made no order as to costs.

Court Disposition

application dismissed for non-compliance and non-prosecution; case closed

Orders

  • The ex parte Applicant’s Chamber Summons dated 12th October 2020 is dismissed for non-compliance and non-prosecution, with no order as to costs.
  • The case is marked as closed.