[2025] KECA 567 (KLR)
The court found that the appellants had made reasonable efforts to substitute the deceased respondent and had obtained a limited grant appointing Stanley Mwiti M’Inoti as the legal representative. The requirements of rule 102 of the Court of Appeal Rules were satisfied, as the appellants demonstrated sufficient...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KECA 567 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Sabella Gaiti M’inoti; Appellant: Japhet Kinyua M’inoti; Appellant: Frankline Muriungi M’inoti; Appellant: Gerrishon Gituma M’inoti; Respondent: Alfred Mugambi M’iniu; Respondent: Stanley Mwiti M’Inoti (as legal representative of the deceased respondent)
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Nyeri
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal (Application) 278 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal Application / Application for Revival of Abated Appeal and Substitution of Deceased Respondent
- Outcome
- Application allowed. Appeal revived and substitution of respondent granted.
- Judges
- S ole Kantai
- Legal Topics
- Abatement of Appeal, Substitution of Parties, Revival of Appeal
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sabella Gaiti M’inoti
Appellant
Japhet Kinyua M’inoti
Appellant
Frankline Muriungi M’inoti
Appellant
Gerrishon Gituma M’inoti
Appellant
Alfred Mugambi M’iniu
Respondent
Stanley Mwiti M’Inoti (as legal representative of the deceased respondent)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal Application / Application for Revival of Abated Appeal and Substitution of Deceased Respondent
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal should be revived after abatement due to the death of the respondent.
- 2 Whether the substitution of the deceased respondent with a legal representative is proper under the rules.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the appellants had made reasonable efforts to substitute the deceased respondent and had obtained a limited grant appointing Stanley Mwiti M’Inoti as the legal representative. The requirements of rule 102 of the Court of Appeal Rules were satisfied, as the appellants demonstrated sufficient cause for the delay in substitution. The court exercised its discretion to revive the abated appeal and allowed the substitution of the deceased respondent with the appointed legal representative, ensuring that the appeal could proceed on its merits.
Court Disposition
Application allowed. Appeal revived and substitution of respondent granted.
Orders
- Stanley Mwiti M’Inoti is appointed to represent the Estate of the deceased respondent.
- The appeal is revived and will be listed for hearing in the normal course.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
M’inoti & 3 others v M’iniu (Civil Appeal (Application) 278 of 2019) [2025] KECA 567 (KLR) (28 March 2025) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2025] KECA 567 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Court of Appeal at Nyeri
Civil Appeal (Application) 278 of 2019
S ole Kantai, JA
March 28, 2025
Between
Sabella Gaiti M’inoti
1st Appellant
Japhet Kinyua M’inoti
2nd Appellant
Frankline Muriungi M’inoti
3rd Appellant
Gerrishon Gituma M’inoti
4th Appellant
and
Alfred Mugambi M’iniu
Respondent
((An application for the revival of the appeal and substitution) in Civil Appeal No. 278 of 2019. )
Ruling
1. In the Motion bought under rule 102 of the Court of appeal Rules the appellants pray that the court be pleased to order the appointment of the respondent’s legal representative one Stanley Mwiti M’inoti as a party to represent the respondent who is deceased; that the court be pleased to revive the appeal which has abated. The application is supported by grounds on its face and a supporting affidavit of one of the appellant’s Gerrishon Gituma M’Inoti to the effect that the appeal has been pending but that the respondent died on 18th November, 2022; that it took the appellants time to have the family of the deceased to take out a grant which took time to be done; that there is need to have a legal representative to be appointed to represent the deceased in the appeal. Further, that after the appellants applied in Miscellaneous Succession Case No. E006 of 2024 the respondents finally agreed that Stanley Mwiti M’Inoti take up the grant in respect of the Estate of the deceased. Attached to the application is a limited grant (letters of Administration Ad Litem) in Chief Magistrates Court of Kenya at Meru in Miscellaneous Case No. 27 of 2024 In the matter of the Estate of Alfred Mugambi M’Iniu (deceased) issued on 29th February, 2024.
2. I have seen hearing notice dated 7th March, 2025 at 11. 37 a.m. to danielanampiu anampiugikunda@gmail.com, leonardondari kibagendiondari@yahoo.com, willsonpmburungu wilsonpmburugu@gmail.com where the parties were notified of the hearing date and were required to file written submissions. I have not seen any submissions by either side.
3. I am told that the respondent died on 18th November, 2022. The appeal has since abated as no application was made within 12 months of the death of the respondent.
4. The applicants made efforts to have the respondent substituted and filed an application in the subordinate court where a legal representative was appointed to represent the Estate of the deceased. The applicants have satisfied the requirement in rule 102 of the rules and are entitled to substitute the deceased respondent with the person appointed as the legal representative of the Estateof the deceased. The Motion succeeds and I allow it. Stanley Mwiti M’Inoti will represent the Estate of the respondent. I revive the appeal which will be listed for hearing in the normal way. I make no order on costs.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT NYERI THIS 28TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025. S. ole KANTAI...................................JUDGE OF APPEALI certify that this is a true copy of the originalSignedDEPUTY REGISTRAR