[2025] KEBPRT 275 (KLR)
The tribunal found that the landlord's valuation report was more persuasive because it provided specific comparables for similar premises on the same street, whereas the tenant's report did not disclose its comparables. The tribunal emphasized that its duty is to assess the reasonableness of the proposed rent increase, taking into account both the current tenancy terms and prevailing open market rates. While the landlord sought a 75% increase, the tribunal considered this excessive in the absence of evidence regarding the duration of the current rent and to meet the test of reasonableness. Accordingly, the tribunal approved a 50% increase, setting the new rent at Kshs. 22,500 per month,...
- Citation
- [2025] KEBPRT 275 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Samir Abdulwahid Miran; Respondent: Najmun Edward
- Court
- Business Premises Rent Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 30 April 2025
- Case Number
- Tribunal Case E250 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Rent Determination Application / Ruling on Reference Against Landlord's Notice to Increase Rent
- Outcome
- Landlord's notice to increase rent partially allowed; rent increased to Kshs. 22,500 per month effective 1 May 2025; each party to bear own costs; file closed.
- Judges
- CN Mugambi
- Legal Topics
- Controlled Tenancy, Rent Assessment, Valuation Reports, Open Market Rent, Tribunal Powers
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Samir Abdulwahid Miran
Applicant
Najmun Edward
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Rent Determination Application / Ruling on Reference Against Landlord's Notice to Increase Rent
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the landlord's notice to increase rent from Kshs. 15,000 to Kshs. 26,300 per month should be allowed.
- 2 Which valuation report provides a more reliable basis for determining the reasonable rent for the premises.
- 3 What is the reasonable rent payable for the suit premises under the applicable law.
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the landlord's valuation report was more persuasive because it provided specific comparables for similar premises on the same street, whereas the tenant's report did not disclose its comparables. The tribunal emphasized that its duty is to assess the reasonableness of the proposed rent increase, taking into account both the current tenancy terms and prevailing open market rates. While the landlord sought a 75% increase, the tribunal considered this excessive in the absence of evidence regarding the duration of the current rent and to meet the test of reasonableness. Accordingly, the tribunal approved a 50% increase, setting the new rent at Kshs. 22,500 per month,...
Court Disposition
Landlord's notice to increase rent partially allowed; rent increased to Kshs. 22,500 per month effective 1 May 2025; each party to bear own costs; file closed.
Orders
- The rent payable for the suit premises is assessed at Kshs. 22,500 per month effective 1 May 2025.
- Each party shall bear their own costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment