[2017] KEELC 38 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 38 (KLR)

The court adopted the consent of the parties as its order, finding that the consent was properly signed and binding. The parties agreed to maintain the status quo, specifically that no construction would take place on the suit land and each party would continue occupying their current portion. The court further...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELC 38 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Miriam Nthama Mutwiri; Defendant: Joseph Mungathia Machoki; Defendant: Geoffrey Kaumbuthu; Defendant: Albert Mutabari
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 308 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Land and Property Dispute / Consent Order
Outcome
Application settled by consent; status quo to be maintained; each party to bear own costs.
Legal Topics
Status Quo Orders, Occupation of Land, Construction Restrictions
Source Language
en
Land and Property Status Quo Orders Occupation of Land Construction Restrictions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Miriam Nthama Mutwiri

Plaintiff

Joseph Mungathia Machoki

Defendant

Geoffrey Kaumbuthu

Defendant

Albert Mutabari

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land and Property Dispute / Consent Order

  1. 1 Whether the parties should maintain the status quo regarding occupation and construction on the suit land pending further proceedings.

Ratio Decidendi

The court adopted the consent of the parties as its order, finding that the consent was properly signed and binding. The parties agreed to maintain the status quo, specifically that no construction would take place on the suit land and each party would continue occupying their current portion. The court further ordered that each party bear their own costs, thereby settling the application dated 10.10.17 by consent and preserving the current state of affairs until the pre-trial conference.

Court Disposition

Application settled by consent; status quo to be maintained; each party to bear own costs.

Orders

  • Application dated 10.10.17 is settled by maintaining status quo: no party to construct on the suit land.
  • Each party to continue occupying the portion of land they currently occupy.