[2012] KEHC 4168 (KLR)
The court found that the ex parte proceedings of 24th April 2012 were irregular because the matter was listed for directions, not for hearing, and all relevant parties, including Ms. Betty Murungi, had not been properly served or given an opportunity to respond to the affidavits referencing her. The court held that in the interests of justice and fair hearing, the ex parte proceedings must be struck out and the matter should proceed by way of viva voce evidence, with all relevant parties properly served.
- Citation
- [2012] KEHC 4168 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: __MISSING__; Respondent: __MISSING__
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 7 June 2012
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 2004 of 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Ex Parte Proceedings and Directions for Hearing
- Outcome
- Ex parte proceedings of 24th April 2012 struck out; directions issued for viva voce hearing with proper service to all relevant parties.
- Judges
- CN Mugo
- Legal Topics
- Succession Proceedings, Revocation of Grant, Viva Voce Evidence
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
__MISSING__
Applicant
__MISSING__
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Ex Parte Proceedings and Directions for Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the summons for revocation dated 5th March 2012 was properly heard ex parte on 24th April 2012.
- 2 Whether viva voce evidence is necessary for the determination of the application.
- 3 Whether Ms. Betty Murungi, Advocate, should be served and given an opportunity to respond to depositions touching on her involvement.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the ex parte proceedings of 24th April 2012 were irregular because the matter was listed for directions, not for hearing, and all relevant parties, including Ms. Betty Murungi, had not been properly served or given an opportunity to respond to the affidavits referencing her. The court held that in the interests of justice and fair hearing, the ex parte proceedings must be struck out and the matter should proceed by way of viva voce evidence, with all relevant parties properly served.
Court Disposition
Ex parte proceedings of 24th April 2012 struck out; directions issued for viva voce hearing with proper service to all relevant parties.
Orders
- The ex parte proceedings of 24th April 2012 are struck out.
- The matter shall proceed by way of viva voce evidence on a date to be taken at the registry.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment