[2022] KECA 465 (KLR)

[2022] KECA 465 (KLR)

The Court found that, pursuant to rule 53 of the Court of Appeal Rules, the application dated 7th December 2021 for amendment of the notice of appeal ought to be heard before a single Judge. The Court directed that the application be placed before a single Judge within seven days and allowed any party wishing to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KECA 465 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Miwani Sugar Company (1989) Limited In Receivership; Respondent: Crossley Holdings Ltd; Respondent: Cabinet Secretary, Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock & Fisheries; Respondent: Agriculture & Food Authority; Respondent: County Government of Kisumu; Respondent: Attorney General; Respondent: Richard Ochieng Ogendo; Respondent: Julius Okello Kungu
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application E207 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application to Amend Notice of Appeal
Outcome
Application to amend notice of appeal to be heard before a single Judge; directions issued for filing of responses; costs in the appeal.
Judges
DK Musinga, S ole Kantai, A Mbogholi-Msagha
Legal Topics
Amendment of Notice of Appeal, Court of Appeal Rules, Interlocutory Applications
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Amendment of Notice of Appeal Court of Appeal Rules Interlocutory Applications

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Miwani Sugar Company (1989) Limited In Receivership

Applicant

Crossley Holdings Ltd

Respondent

Cabinet Secretary, Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock & Fisheries

Respondent

Agriculture & Food Authority

Respondent

County Government of Kisumu

Respondent

Attorney General

Respondent

Richard Ochieng Ogendo

Respondent

Julius Okello Kungu

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application to Amend Notice of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the application to amend the notice of appeal should be heard before a single Judge as per the Court of Appeal Rules.
  2. 2 Whether parties opposing the application should be granted time to file replying affidavits and submissions.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that, pursuant to rule 53 of the Court of Appeal Rules, the application dated 7th December 2021 for amendment of the notice of appeal ought to be heard before a single Judge. The Court directed that the application be placed before a single Judge within seven days and allowed any party wishing to oppose the application to file and serve a replying affidavit and submissions within three days. The Court exercised its discretion to ensure procedural fairness and compliance with the rules, without making a determination on the merits of the amendment application itself.

Court Disposition

Application to amend notice of appeal to be heard before a single Judge; directions issued for filing of responses; costs in the appeal.

Orders

  • The applicant's application dated 7th December 2021 to amend the notice of appeal shall be placed before a single Judge within seven days from the date of this ruling.
  • Any party wishing to oppose the application may file and serve a replying affidavit and submissions within three days from the date of this ruling.