[2025] KEHC 9571 (KLR)

[2025] KEHC 9571 (KLR)

The court held that if the respondents are found to be in contempt of court for disobeying conservatory orders, they will not be granted audience until they purge the contempt. The court directed that the application alleging contempt and the respondents' preliminary objection be heard together, with a strict...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEHC 9571 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Dorcas Mlughu & 3 others; Respondent: Acting Speaker of the County Assembly of Taita Taveta; Respondent: Privileges and Immunities Committee; Respondent: County Assembly of Taita Taveta
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Voi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Constitutional Petition E013 of 2025
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Interlocutory Ruling on Contempt and Directions for Submissions
Outcome
Directions issued for simultaneous hearing of contempt application and preliminary objection; strict timelines for submissions; mention date set.
Judges
AN Ongeri
Legal Topics
Contempt of Court, Conservatory Orders, Removal From Office, Preliminary Objection
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Civil Procedure Contempt of Court Conservatory Orders Removal From Office Preliminary Objection

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dorcas Mlughu & 3 others

Applicant

Acting Speaker of the County Assembly of Taita Taveta

Respondent

Privileges and Immunities Committee

Respondent

County Assembly of Taita Taveta

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Interlocutory Ruling on Contempt and Directions for Submissions

  1. 1 Whether the respondents are in contempt of court for proceeding with the removal of the petitioners despite conservatory orders.
  2. 2 Whether respondents should be denied audience until contempt is purged.
  3. 3 Directions for hearing the application and preliminary objection.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that if the respondents are found to be in contempt of court for disobeying conservatory orders, they will not be granted audience until they purge the contempt. The court directed that the application alleging contempt and the respondents' preliminary objection be heard together, with a strict timetable for the filing of submissions by both parties. The court emphasized the importance of compliance with court orders and set a mention date for further directions.

Court Disposition

Directions issued for simultaneous hearing of contempt application and preliminary objection; strict timelines for submissions; mention date set.

Orders

  • Applicants to file submissions on the application dated 17th June 2025 within 3 days.
  • Respondents to file submissions on the application and preliminary objection within 3 days thereafter.