[2009] KEHC 950 (KLR)
The court found that the petitioner had established the grounds of desertion and cruelty. The respondent had left the matrimonial home in 1998, only returning briefly in 2002, and had not cohabited with the petitioner since. The respondent's denial of conjugal rights for nearly ten years amounted to cruelty. The...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2009] KEHC 950 (KLR)
- Parties
- Petitioner: M.M.W alias M.M.H; Respondent: R.B.H
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Divorce Cause 28 of 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- petition allowed; marriage dissolved
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Matrimonial Offences, Desertion, Cruelty, Irretrievable Breakdown, Conjugal Rights
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M.M.W alias M.M.H
Petitioner
R.B.H
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent deserted the petitioner, thereby justifying dissolution of the marriage.
- 2 Whether the respondent treated the petitioner with cruelty, amounting to a matrimonial offence.
- 3 Whether the marriage has irretrievably broken down.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the petitioner had established the grounds of desertion and cruelty. The respondent had left the matrimonial home in 1998, only returning briefly in 2002, and had not cohabited with the petitioner since. The respondent's denial of conjugal rights for nearly ten years amounted to cruelty. The evidence was uncontroverted as the respondent did not participate in the proceedings. The court concluded that the marriage had irretrievably broken down and ordered its dissolution.
Court Disposition
petition allowed; marriage dissolved
Orders
- Decree nisi to issue forthwith.
- Decree nisi to be made absolute after the statutory period.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT MOMBASA Divorce Cause 28 of 2008
M.M. H ALIAS
M.M.W………………………..……..……………..…..PETITIONER
VERSUS
R.B.H………………..….…………………………….RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
M.M.W also known as M.M.H (hereinafter “the Petitioner”) and R. B. H (hereinafter “the Respondent”) were married on 7th November 1970 under the Marriage Act (Cap 150 Laws of Kenya). The couple have five (5) issues namely: M.H.R, A.M.R, M.W.R, Z.N.R and S.W.R. All the issues are adults.
The couple lived and cohabited in Nairobi and in Mombasa until 2002 when cohabitation came to an end. On 9th June 2008 the Petitioner lodged this petition for divorce on the grounds of the Respondent’s desertion and cruelty.
With regard to desertion, the petitioner alleged that the respondent had left her for Uganda in 1998 and had only returned for the wedding of their son, M.W, in August 2002. He had then left the same day never to come back to the matrimonial home until the filing of this petition.
With regard to cruelty, the petitioner had alleged that the respondent did not provide for her or the issues of the marriage and she had single handedly raised the said children. She further alleged that the respondent denied her her conjugal rights.
The Respondent did not file an answer to the petition. The petition therefore proceeded ex-parte. In her oral testimony before me, the petitioner stated that since 2002, the respondent had not lived or cohabited with her. The Respondent now lives in Lunga Lunga with another woman while she lives in Mombasa. She testified that they have not had any conjugal relations for nearly ten (10) years. In her view, their marriage has irretrievably broken down and should be dissolved.
Having considered the evidence adduced before me, I am persuaded that the petitioner has established the ground of desertion. With regard to cruelty, the petitioner has demonstrated that for nearly ten (10) years the Respondent has denied her conjugal rights. That denial in my view amounts to the matrimonial offence of cruelty. The petitioner has therefore also established the ground of cruelty. The evidence of the petitioner has not in any event controverted.
In the end, I find that the Respondent has since the celebration of his marriage with the Petitioner treated the petitioner with cruelty and further that he is in desertion of the petitioner. The marriage between the petitioner and the Respondent has irretrievably broken down and is hereby dissolved. Decree nisi to issue forthwith and the same to be made absolute after the statutory period.
I make no order as to costs.
Order accordingly.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT MOMBASA THIS 8TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2009.
F. AZANGALALA
JUDGE
Read in the presence of:-
Mutungi holding brief for Munyari for the Petitioner.
F. AZANGALALA
JUDGE
8TH OCTOBER 2009