[2025] KEHC 9204 (KLR)
The court found that the respondent's preliminary objection, which challenged the court's jurisdiction on the basis that no marriage existed between the parties, could not be determined as a pure point of law. The existence of a marriage under Kikuyu Customary Law and the status of the property as matrimonial...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KEHC 9204 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: MM; Respondent: FNG
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kiambu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 10 April 2025
- Case Number
- Family Originating Summons E003 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Family Originating Summons / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- preliminary objection dismissed; main suit to proceed
- Judges
- DO Chepkwony
- Legal Topics
- Matrimonial Property, Customary Marriage, Jurisdiction of Family Court, Preliminary Objection, Cohabitation Rights
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MM
Applicant
FNG
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family Originating Summons / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to determine issues relating to matrimonial property where the existence of a marriage under customary law is disputed.
- 2 Whether the preliminary objection raises a pure point of law or requires determination of factual issues.
- 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to interim protection from eviction pending determination of the main suit.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondent's preliminary objection, which challenged the court's jurisdiction on the basis that no marriage existed between the parties, could not be determined as a pure point of law. The existence of a marriage under Kikuyu Customary Law and the status of the property as matrimonial property are factual matters that require evidence and cannot be resolved at the preliminary stage. Therefore, the preliminary objection lacked merit and was dismissed, allowing the main suit to proceed to hearing on its merits. The court also extended interim orders protecting the applicant from eviction pending the determination of the originating summons.
Court Disposition
preliminary objection dismissed; main suit to proceed
Orders
- The Notice of Preliminary Objection is dismissed with costs to the applicant.
- The parties to proceed with the hearing of the Originating Summons dated 23rd January, 2024.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment