[2022] KECA 67 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants had provided a detailed and satisfactory explanation for the delay in filing the record of appeal, including the failure of previous advocates to apply for certified proceedings, administrative delays in the court registry, and the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic. The court noted...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KECA 67 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Lucy Kirumba M'Mbijiwe; Applicant: Beth Muthoni Rukaruia; Applicant: M’Rukaria M’Turuchiu; Respondent: Alloysious Iriga
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Nyeri
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Application 119 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Extension of Time Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File and Serve Record of Appeal
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- S ole Kantai
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Appeals Process, Record of Appeal Filing, Irregular Land Transfer
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lucy Kirumba M'Mbijiwe
Applicant
Beth Muthoni Rukaruia
Applicant
M’Rukaria M’Turuchiu
Applicant
Alloysious Iriga
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Extension of Time Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File and Serve Record of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants have provided sufficient reasons to warrant extension of time to file and serve the record of appeal out of time.
- 2 Whether the delay in filing the record of appeal was excusable under the circumstances presented.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants had provided a detailed and satisfactory explanation for the delay in filing the record of appeal, including the failure of previous advocates to apply for certified proceedings, administrative delays in the court registry, and the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic. The court noted that the notice of appeal was lodged within time and that the applicants had taken substantial steps to pursue the appeal once the errors were discovered. The draft memorandum of appeal disclosed substantial grounds. In the absence of opposition from the respondent and in the interests of justice, the court exercised its discretion to grant the extension of time sought,...
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The applicants are granted leave to lodge the record of appeal within twenty-one (21) days from the date of the ruling.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
M'Mbijiwe & 2 others v Iriga (Civil Application 119 of 2020) [2022] KECA 67 (KLR) (4 February 2022) (Ruling)
Neutral citation number: [2022] KECA 67 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Court of Appeal at Nyeri
Civil Application 119 of 2020
S ole Kantai, JA
February 4, 2022
Between
Lucy Kirumba M'Mbijiwe
1st Applicant
Beth Muthoni Rukaruia
2nd Applicant
M’Rukaria M’Turuchiu
3rd Applicant
and
Alloysious Iriga
Respondent
(Being an application for extension of time to file and serve record of appeal from the judgment of Environment & Land Court of Kenya at Meru (Cherono, J.) dated 14th June, 2018 in ELC Case No. 33’B’ of 1997)
Ruling
1. In the motion brought under Rule 4 of this Court’s Rules and Sections 3A and 3B of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act, I am asked to extend time within which to file and serve record of appeal out of time against the judgment and orders of the Environment & Land Court in Meru ELC Case 32’B’/1997 (Cherono, J).
2. In grounds in support of the motion and in an affidavit of M’Rukaria M’Turuchiu (the 3rd applicant), it is said that the applicants (they are 3) have a good appeal with high chances of success; that the record of appeal is ready for filing; that failure to prepare and file record of appeal in good time was occasioned by factors beyond their control. The affidavit in support expounds on those grounds stating that after judgment was delivered on 14th June, 2018, a notice of appeal against the said judgment was lodged on 26th June, 2018 but the advocates on record failed to apply for certified proceedings and judgment and when the applicants realized that error they appointed new advocates. The new lawyer applied for certified proceedings on 5th February, 2019 but fees payable was not assessed until 22nd November, 2019 as the court file was not traced. Then Covid 19 pandemic came and the applicants were unable to obtain the decree and the certificate of delay in time and they only obtained the same on or about 5th October, 2020. The applicants were unable to file a notice of appeal because the court registry was not accessible.
3. There was no replying affidavit when I considered the motion. I have considered the motion, the affidavit in support and various documents in support. I note in the judgment intended to be appealed, there are findings of irregular transfer of land and certain orders are made by the learned trial Judge.
4. A notice of appeal was lodged on 26th June, 2018 which was within time as judgment was delivered on 14th June, 2018. The applicants have explained in detail reasons why they were not able to file a record of appeal, a record which they now say is ready for filing.
5. I note that there are substantial grounds taken in the draft memorandum of appeal. The applicants have satisfied me and I am prepared to exercise my discretion in their favour. Let record of appeal be lodged within twenty-one (21) days of today.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2022. S. ole KANTAI.................................JUDGE OF APPEALI certify that this is a true copy of the originalSignedDEPUTY REGISTRAR