[2023] KEELC 19157 (KLR)

[2023] KEELC 19157 (KLR)

The court held that since the contemnor had already been found in contempt of court on 27.10.2022, the only matter before it was the sentencing following the notice to show cause. The court declined to consider documents filed by the contemnor in response to an application dated 13.7.2023, as no directions had been...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELC 19157 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Ian Gonji M’mboga; Applicant: Megeria Kibuchi Mageria; Respondent: Benjamin Kimeria Kagumba; MISSING: Autogari Kenya Limited
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application E080 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice to Show Cause for Contempt and Sentencing
Outcome
Ruling delivered on sentencing for contempt of court; extraneous applications and appellate matters not considered.
Judges
LN Mbugua
Legal Topics
Contempt of Court, Notice to Show Cause, Court Orders Enforcement
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Contempt of Court Notice to Show Cause Court Orders Enforcement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ian Gonji M’mboga

Applicant

Megeria Kibuchi Mageria

Applicant

Benjamin Kimeria Kagumba

Respondent

Autogari Kenya Limited

MISSING

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice to Show Cause for Contempt and Sentencing

  1. 1 Whether the contemnor should be punished for contempt of court as previously found on 27.10.2022.
  2. 2 Whether documents filed by the contemnor in response to an application filed on 13.7.2023 should be considered in the current proceedings.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that since the contemnor had already been found in contempt of court on 27.10.2022, the only matter before it was the sentencing following the notice to show cause. The court declined to consider documents filed by the contemnor in response to an application dated 13.7.2023, as no directions had been given regarding those documents. The court also declined to address issues pending before the Court of Appeal, affirming that such matters are within the jurisdiction of that court. Accordingly, the court proceeded to deliver its ruling on sentencing for contempt without considering extraneous matters.

Court Disposition

Ruling delivered on sentencing for contempt of court; extraneous applications and appellate matters not considered.

Orders

  • The court proceeds to deliver its ruling on sentencing for contempt of court.
  • Documents filed by the contemnor in response to the application dated 13.7.2023 are not considered.