[2020] KEHC 8058 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 8058 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated sufficient cause for the grant of stay of execution and payment by installments, considering his advanced age, lack of substantial income, and the absence of opposition from the respondents. The parties, through their advocates, entered into a consent for the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 8058 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: M’Nyeri M’Rimunya; Defendant: Beth Kaari; Defendant: Prudence Mukiri; Defendant: Phares Gitari Nkoroi
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Chuka
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 221 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution and Payment by Installments
Outcome
Application allowed by consent; consent adopted as order of the court.
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Payment by Installments, Decretal Sum Enforcement, Costs Taxation
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Stay of Execution Payment by Installments Decretal Sum Enforcement Costs Taxation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

M’Nyeri M’Rimunya

Plaintiff

Beth Kaari

Defendant

Prudence Mukiri

Defendant

Phares Gitari Nkoroi

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution and Payment by Installments

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted a stay of execution of the judgment and/or order for costs pending payment by installments.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant should be allowed to liquidate the decretal sum in quarterly installments as proposed.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated sufficient cause for the grant of stay of execution and payment by installments, considering his advanced age, lack of substantial income, and the absence of opposition from the respondents. The parties, through their advocates, entered into a consent for the payment of the taxed costs, which the court adopted as its order. The consent provided for the matter to be mentioned after four months to confirm payment of the decretal sum. The court emphasized that consent orders are binding and enforceable as court orders, and thus, the terms agreed upon by the parties would govern the execution and payment process. Costs were ordered to be in...

Court Disposition

Application allowed by consent; consent adopted as order of the court.

Orders

  • The consent for payment of taxed costs of Kshs.485,191.33 is adopted as an order of the court.
  • The matter to be mentioned after four months to confirm payment of the taxed costs.