[2024] KEELC 4034 (KLR)

[2024] KEELC 4034 (KLR)

The plaintiff is the registered owner of the suit land, as confirmed by both a previous court judgment (ELC 701/2017) and a Land Registrar's report. The defendants have encroached on the land and failed to establish any lawful claim or respond to the application despite being served and given an opportunity. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEELC 4034 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Pius Nyabuga Mochoge; Defendant: Daniel Ndinini; Defendant: Rerai Parsitau
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kajiado
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Miscellaneous Case E008 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Amended Notice of Motion for Eviction and Demolition Orders
Outcome
Application allowed. Orders granted as prayed in prayers 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 of the motion.
Judges
MN Gicheru
Legal Topics
Eviction Orders, Registered Land Ownership, Trespass and Encroachment, Execution of Court Orders
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Eviction Orders Registered Land Ownership Trespass and Encroachment Execution of Court Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Pius Nyabuga Mochoge

Plaintiff

Daniel Ndinini

Defendant

Rerai Parsitau

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Amended Notice of Motion for Eviction and Demolition Orders

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff, as registered owner, is entitled to eviction orders against the defendants from the suit land.
  2. 2 Whether the court should order demolition of structures erected by the defendants on the suit land.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to enforcement and security for execution of the eviction order.

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff is the registered owner of the suit land, as confirmed by both a previous court judgment (ELC 701/2017) and a Land Registrar's report. The defendants have encroached on the land and failed to establish any lawful claim or respond to the application despite being served and given an opportunity. The rights of a registered proprietor under the Land Registration Act are indefeasible except as provided by law, and the plaintiff is entitled to vacant possession. The absence of an eviction prayer in the earlier suit does not bar the present application. The court finds the application meritorious and grants the orders sought to enforce the plaintiff's rights, including eviction,...

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Orders granted as prayed in prayers 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 of the motion.

Orders

  • Eviction order issued against the respondents, their servants, agents, heirs, and dependants from L.R. Kajiado/Loodariak/159.
  • Order for demolition of all structures erected on the suit land by the respondents or anyone claiming through them to ensure vacant possession.