[2025] KEHC 8358 (KLR)
The court found that the Certificate of Taxation issued to the applicant was uncontested, as the respondent neither filed a reference nor appealed against the ruling. Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act empowers the court to enter judgment on the taxed amount where the certificate is final and the retainer is not...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KEHC 8358 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Mogaka Nyantika Muriuki & Co Advocates; Respondent: Nancy Njeri Kamweti
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kiambu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Application E201 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- application allowed; judgment entered for applicant; each party to bear own costs
- Judges
- A Mshila
- Legal Topics
- Advocate Client Costs, Certificate of Taxation, Judgment Entry on Taxed Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mogaka Nyantika Muriuki & Co Advocates
Applicant
Nancy Njeri Kamweti
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application is merited for the court to adopt the Certificate of Taxation and enter judgment in the sum of Kshs.985,567/-.
- 2 Whether the Certificate of Taxation is final and uncontested, warranting entry of judgment.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Certificate of Taxation issued to the applicant was uncontested, as the respondent neither filed a reference nor appealed against the ruling. Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act empowers the court to enter judgment on the taxed amount where the certificate is final and the retainer is not disputed. The court was satisfied that the requirements for entry of judgment had been met, as the respondent had not challenged the certificate in any way. Accordingly, the court adopted the Certificate of Taxation as its judgment and entered judgment in favour of the applicant for the sum of Kshs.985,567/-. Each party was ordered to bear their own costs of the application.
Court Disposition
application allowed; judgment entered for applicant; each party to bear own costs
Orders
- The application is allowed.
- The Certificate of Taxation issued on 20/06/2024 in the sum of Kshs.985,567/- is adopted as a judgment of the court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
29 paragraphs
Mogaka Nyantika Muriuki & Co Advocates v Kamweti (Miscellaneous Application E201 of 2022) [2025] KEHC 8358 (KLR) (13 June 2025) (Judgment)
Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 8358 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kiambu
Miscellaneous Application E201 of 2022
A Mshila, J
June 13, 2025
Between
Mogaka Nyantika Muriuki & Co Advocates
Applicant
and
Nancy Njeri Kamweti
Respondent
Judgment
1. Before court is the Notice of Motion dated 16/01/2025 and brought under Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act (CAP 16); Order 51 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules and all Enabling Provisions of law; The Applicant sought for the following orders:-a.That this Honourable Court be pleased to enter Judgment in favor of the Applicant/Advocate herein, in accordance with the taxed costs of Kenya Shillings Nine Hundred and Eighty - Five Thousand Five Hundred and Sixty Seven (Kshs.985,567/-).b.That the costs be provided for and the Respondent be condemned to pay the costs of this application.
2. The application is premised on the grounds on the face of the application and the Supporting Affidavit of Victor Muriuki dated 16/01/2025. made in support of the application; therein he states that the Respondent instructed the firm of Mogaka Nyantika Muriuki & Co. Advocates to act for her in Kiambu Chief Magistrates Court in Civil Case No. E005 Of 2021.
3. The Respondent failed to pay the legal fees thereby necessitating the filing of the Bill of Costs which was taxed and a Certificate of Taxation was issued for Kenya Shillings Nine Hundred and Eighty - Five Thousand Five Hundred and Sixty Seven (Kshs.985,567/-) which the Respondent has failed and/or neglected to settle.
4. The instant application was uncontested as the Respondent failed and or neglected to file any response despite service having been effected.
5. The Applicant prayed that judgment be entered as prayed for the sum of Kenya Shillings Nine Hundred and Eighty - Five Thousand Five Hundred and Sixty Seven (Kshs.985,567/-); The Applicant also prayed for costs of the application.
Issues For Determination 6. Having considered the application and the supporting affidavit the issues framed for determination are;i.Whether the application is merited for the court to adopt the Certificate of Taxation and enter judgment in the sum of Kenya Shillings Nine Hundred and Eighty - Five Thousand Five Hundred and Sixty Seven (Kshs.985,567/-).
Analysis 7. Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act provides:-“the certificate of the taxing officer by whom any bill has been taxed shall unless it is set aside or altered by the court, be final as to the amount of the costs recovered thereby; and the court may make such orders in relation thereto as it thinks fit, including where the retainer is not disputed an order that judgment be entered for the sum of certified to be due with costs.”
8. The wordings of the above section empower the court to enter judgment on the taxed amount if the same is uncontested.
9. In determining whether the court should adopt the amount on the Certificate of Taxation as the judgment of the court it should be satisfied that the certificate of taxation has not been set aside.
10. Reference is made to the case of Lubulellah & Associates Advocates Vs N. K. Brothers Limited (2014) eKLR where the court observed that:-“The law is very clear that once a taxing master has taxed the costs, issued a Certificate of Costs and there is no reference against his ruling or there has been a ruling and a determination made and not set aside and/or altered, no other action would be required from the court save to enter judgment. An applicant is not required to file suit for the recovery of costs. The certificate of costs is final as to the amounts of the costs and the court would be quite in order to enter judgment in favour of the Applicant against the Respondent herein for the taxed sum indicated in the Certificate of Taxation that was issued on 25th November 2012. ”
11. From perusal of the court record this Court is satisfied that the Ruling is uncontested as the Respondent has not moved any court by way of filing a Reference against the ruling nor has the Ruling been set aside, altered, varied and / or reviewed, nor has any appeal been filed.
12. Therefore, no other action is required from this court save to enter judgment as prayed against the Respondent.
Findings & Determination 13. For the forgoing reasons this court makes the following findings and determinations:-i.This Court finds the application to be meritorious and it is hereby allowed;ii.The Certificate of Taxation issued on 20/06/2024 in the sum of Kenya Shillings Nine Hundred and Eighty - Five Thousand Five Hundred and Sixty-Seven (Kshs.985,567/-) is hereby adopted as a Judgment of this court. Judgment be and is hereby entered in favour of the Applicant/Advocates in the sum of Kshs.985,567/-;iii.To bring closure to this matter each party to bear their own costs of this application.
Orders Accordingly.
DATED SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIA TEAMS AT KIAMBU THIS 13th DAY OF JUNE, 2025. HON. A. MSHILAJUDGEIn the presence of;Sanja – Court AssistantMuriuki for Applicant