[2018] KEHC 3513 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 3513 (KLR)

The court found that the respondent's demand for tea cess and the impounding of the applicant's vehicles were not supported by the Nyamira County Finance Act, 2016, which only provides for a manufacturing levy that the applicant had already paid. Since the respondent did not oppose the application or attend the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 3513 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Mogeni Tea Factory Limited; Respondent: Nyamira County Government
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nyamira
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Constitutional Petition 1 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Outcome
Application allowed in part; conservatory and injunctive orders granted as prayed in prayers 3 and 4; costs to abide the petition.
Judges
EM Muchoki
Legal Topics
County Finance Act, Unlawful Levies, Injunctive Relief, Conservatory Orders
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Administrative Law County Finance Act Unlawful Levies Injunctive Relief Conservatory Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mogeni Tea Factory Limited

Applicant

Nyamira County Government

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Interlocutory Application

  1. 1 Whether the respondent is lawfully entitled to levy and collect tea cess not provided for in the Nyamira County Finance Act, 2016.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent's impounding of the applicant's vehicles and goods for non-payment of such cess is lawful.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to conservatory and injunctive relief restraining the respondent from demanding or collecting unlawful levies.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondent's demand for tea cess and the impounding of the applicant's vehicles were not supported by the Nyamira County Finance Act, 2016, which only provides for a manufacturing levy that the applicant had already paid. Since the respondent did not oppose the application or attend the hearing, and the orders sought were conservatory in nature, the court granted the injunctive relief sought in prayers 3 and 4 of the application, restraining the respondent from seizing the applicant's vehicles or demanding levies not prescribed by law, pending determination of the petition.

Court Disposition

Application allowed in part; conservatory and injunctive orders granted as prayed in prayers 3 and 4; costs to abide the petition.

Orders

  • Pending the hearing and determination of this suit, the respondent, its agents, servants, workmen and/or employees are restrained by way of temporary injunction from seizing and/or detaining the applicant’s motor vehicles in the course of their business and/or depriving and/or trespassing upon the goods of the...
  • A temporary injunction is issued restraining the respondent through its agents, employees and servants from demanding levies and charges not prescribed for in the Nyamira County Finance Act, 2016, pending the hearing and determination of the petition.