[2024] KEHC 6514 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 6514 (KLR)

The High Court declined to exercise its revisionary jurisdiction because the applicant had already filed an appeal against the conviction and sentence, which was pending determination. Section 364(5) of the Criminal Procedure Code expressly prohibits the court from entertaining revision proceedings at the instance...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 6514 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Samson Onsongo Mogere; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nyamira
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision E087 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
WA Okwany
Legal Topics
Revision Jurisdiction, Sentencing Review, Appeal Pending, Penal Code Offences
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Revision Jurisdiction Sentencing Review Appeal Pending Penal Code Offences

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Samson Onsongo Mogere

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the High Court can entertain a criminal revision application when an appeal on the same matter is pending.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to a review of sentence in light of the pending appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court declined to exercise its revisionary jurisdiction because the applicant had already filed an appeal against the conviction and sentence, which was pending determination. Section 364(5) of the Criminal Procedure Code expressly prohibits the court from entertaining revision proceedings at the instance of a party who could have appealed and has in fact filed an appeal. The existence of the pending appeal ousts the court's jurisdiction to consider the revision application, regardless of the merits or recommendations for a non-custodial sentence. The application was therefore dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for revision is dismissed.