[2024] KEHC 6553 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 6553 (KLR)

The High Court declined to exercise its revisionary jurisdiction because the applicant had already filed an appeal against the conviction and sentence, and the respondent had filed submissions in that appeal. Section 364(5) of the Criminal Procedure Code expressly prohibits the court from entertaining revision...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 6553 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Samson Onsongo Mogere; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nyamira
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision E088 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
WA Okwany
Legal Topics
Revisionary Jurisdiction, Appeal Pending, Burglary Offence
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Civil Procedure Revisionary Jurisdiction Appeal Pending Burglary Offence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Samson Onsongo Mogere

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the High Court can entertain a criminal revision application when an appeal on the same matter is already pending.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to a non-custodial sentence based on the Sentence Review Report.

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court declined to exercise its revisionary jurisdiction because the applicant had already filed an appeal against the conviction and sentence, and the respondent had filed submissions in that appeal. Section 364(5) of the Criminal Procedure Code expressly prohibits the court from entertaining revision proceedings at the instance of a party who could have appealed, where an appeal is pending. The existence of the appeal thus ousted the court's jurisdiction to consider the revision application, regardless of the merits or recommendations in the Sentence Review Report. The application was therefore dismissed for lack of merit.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for revision is dismissed.
  • Orders accordingly.