[2023] KEELC 21213 (KLR)

[2023] KEELC 21213 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had not satisfied the threshold for the grant of a temporary injunction as established in Giella v Cassman Brown. The application sought a 14-day temporary injunction, but by the time of the ruling, the period had already lapsed, rendering the application spent. On the merits, the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELC 21213 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Dire Olow Mohame; Defendant: Bare Muhamed Abdi; Defendant: Abdile Hassan Duale
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Malindi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 33 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Temporary Injunction
Outcome
application dismissed with costs
Judges
EK Makori
Legal Topics
Temporary Injunctions, Prima Facie Case, Community Land Disputes, Trespass, Balance of Convenience
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Temporary Injunctions Prima Facie Case Community Land Disputes Trespass Balance of Convenience

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dire Olow Mohame

Plaintiff

Bare Muhamed Abdi

Defendant

Abdile Hassan Duale

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Temporary Injunction

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has satisfied the conditions for grant of a temporary injunction as set out in Giella v Cassman Brown.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant has established a prima facie case with a probability of success.
  3. 3 Whether the application for a temporary injunction is spent due to lapse of the 14-day period sought.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had not satisfied the threshold for the grant of a temporary injunction as established in Giella v Cassman Brown. The application sought a 14-day temporary injunction, but by the time of the ruling, the period had already lapsed, rendering the application spent. On the merits, the court observed that both parties claimed rights to the land through different leases, and there were ongoing disputes involving the local community and the registered owner, Chakama Ranching Company Limited. The pleadings and supporting documents by the applicant were found to be scanty and insufficient to establish a prima facie case. Consequently, the court dismissed the...

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The application dated 17th May 2023 is dismissed with costs to the respondents.