[2024] KEELC 7123 (KLR)

[2024] KEELC 7123 (KLR)

The court found that the inactivity in the appeal was due to an administrative issue, specifically the failure to obtain the lower court file as requested by the Deputy Registrar on 20th March 2023. Since the application was undefended and the delay was not solely attributable to the appellants, the court determined...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEELC 7123 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Abdulrai-Man Khamis Mohamed; Appellant: Rizik Berek Kramis; Appellant: Abdulrai-Man Klmani; Respondent: Mohamed Ahmed Hadi
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Appeal 27 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Appeal / Ruling on Application for Directions and Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
Outcome
application referred to deputy registrar for administrative action; no order as to costs
Judges
NA Matheka
Legal Topics
Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Appeal Directions, Court Administration
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Dismissal for Want of Prosecution Appeal Directions Court Administration

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Abdulrai-Man Khamis Mohamed

Appellant

Rizik Berek Kramis

Appellant

Abdulrai-Man Klmani

Appellant

Mohamed Ahmed Hadi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Environment and Land Appeal / Ruling on Application for Directions and Dismissal for Want of Prosecution

  1. 1 Whether the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to inactivity for over four years.
  2. 2 Whether the court should give directions on the dormant appeal.
  3. 3 Whether the matter is administrative and should be handled by the Deputy Registrar.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the inactivity in the appeal was due to an administrative issue, specifically the failure to obtain the lower court file as requested by the Deputy Registrar on 20th March 2023. Since the application was undefended and the delay was not solely attributable to the appellants, the court determined that the matter should be referred to the Deputy Registrar for further administrative action rather than dismissing the appeal for want of prosecution. No orders as to costs were made due to the lack of opposition to the application.

Court Disposition

application referred to deputy registrar for administrative action; no order as to costs

Orders

  • The matter is referred to the Deputy Registrar for further action.
  • There will be no orders as to costs.