[2016] KEHC 6734 (KLR)
The court, after perusing the lower court proceedings and judgment, found that the appeal did not raise any arguable or meritorious grounds. The judge exercised the power to summarily reject the appeal under Section 79B of the Civil Procedure Act, holding that the appeal was not worthy of admission as it lacked...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] KEHC 6734 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Mohamed Abubakar Baikada; Appellant: Zainabu Mohamed Abukar; Appellant: Abubakar Mohamed Abukar; Respondent: Hawa Ali Mohamed
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal 47 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Admission of Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal summarily rejected
- Legal Topics
- Summary Rejection of Appeal, Admission of Appeal, Merit of Appeal
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mohamed Abubakar Baikada
Appellant
Zainabu Mohamed Abukar
Appellant
Abubakar Mohamed Abukar
Appellant
Hawa Ali Mohamed
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Admission of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal discloses sufficient merit to warrant admission.
- 2 Whether the lower court proceedings and judgment justify the appeal being admitted.
Ratio Decidendi
The court, after perusing the lower court proceedings and judgment, found that the appeal did not raise any arguable or meritorious grounds. The judge exercised the power to summarily reject the appeal under Section 79B of the Civil Procedure Act, holding that the appeal was not worthy of admission as it lacked merit. The decision was based on a preliminary review of the record, without proceeding to a full hearing, as the appeal failed to meet the threshold for arguability or merit required for admission.
Court Disposition
appeal summarily rejected
Orders
- The appeal is summarily rejected.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
16 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU
CIVIL APPEAL NO 47 OF 2014
MOHAMED ABUBAKAR BAIKADA.......................................1ST APPELANT
ZAINABU MOHAMED ABUKAR..........................................2ND APPELLANT
ABUBAKAR MOHAMED ABUKAR......................................3RD APPELLANT
VERSUS
HAWA ALI MOHAMED.............................................................RESPONDENT
R U L I N G
This matter came before me for admission or non admission of the appeal on 15th February, 2016.
I have perused the proceedings in the lower Court. I have also carefully considered the Judgment being challenged in this matter.
I find that the appeal is not meritorious. It is, there, summarily rejected.
Delivered at Meru this 15th day of February, 2016 in the presence of:-
CC: Daniel
P.M. NJOROGE
JUDGE.