[2020] KEHC 8149 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 8149 (KLR)

The court found that, following the Supreme Court's decision in Muruatetu, the mandatory death sentence imposed on the applicant for robbery with violence under section 296(2) of the Penal Code is unconstitutional. Since the applicant's appeal had been dismissed and his notice of appeal to the Court of Appeal was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 8149 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Mohamed Adan Hussein; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Garissa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Miscellaneous Application 58 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Criminal Miscellaneous Application / Resentencing Application After Conviction and Appeal
Outcome
application_allowed
Judges
CM Kariuki
Legal Topics
Robbery With Violence, Mandatory Sentencing, Resentencing, Unconstitutionality of Death Penalty
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Robbery With Violence Mandatory Sentencing Resentencing Unconstitutionality of Death Penalty

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mohamed Adan Hussein

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Miscellaneous Application / Resentencing Application After Conviction and Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the mandatory death sentence imposed for robbery with violence under section 296(2) of the Penal Code is unconstitutional in light of the Supreme Court decision in Muruatetu.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to resentencing following the withdrawal of his notice of appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, following the Supreme Court's decision in Muruatetu, the mandatory death sentence imposed on the applicant for robbery with violence under section 296(2) of the Penal Code is unconstitutional. Since the applicant's appeal had been dismissed and his notice of appeal to the Court of Appeal was withdrawn, there was no pending appeal. The court held that the applicant is entitled to resentencing, and the appropriate course is to set aside the death sentence and refer the matter back to the trial court for sentencing after considering mitigation. The prosecution's lack of opposition to the application further supported this outcome.

Court Disposition

application_allowed

Orders

  • The death sentence awarded to the applicant in Mandera SPMCRC No. 284 of 2013 on 13/11/2013 is set aside.
  • The matter is referred back to the trial court in Mandera for sentencing after considering mitigations.