[2014] KEHC 1155 (KLR)

[2014] KEHC 1155 (KLR)

The court found that the application for stay of execution was made at the last possible moment, exactly at the expiry of the 90-day period granted for the parties to vacate the suit land. The applicants failed to demonstrate sufficient cause or that they would suffer substantial loss if the stay was not granted....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] KEHC 1155 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Mohamed Ali Askul; Defendant: Ali Mbwana & 13 Others
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 271 of 2007
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
SN Mukunya
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Appeal Pending, Eviction Orders, Possession of Land
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Stay of Execution Appeal Pending Eviction Orders Possession of Land

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mohamed Ali Askul

Plaintiff

Ali Mbwana & 13 Others

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicants are entitled to a stay of execution of the judgment delivered on 6th December 2013 pending appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the applicants have demonstrated sufficient cause for the grant of stay of execution.
  3. 3 Whether the applicants should be required to deposit security as a condition for stay.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application for stay of execution was made at the last possible moment, exactly at the expiry of the 90-day period granted for the parties to vacate the suit land. The applicants failed to demonstrate sufficient cause or that they would suffer substantial loss if the stay was not granted. The court was not persuaded by the applicants' arguments regarding their long occupation or the prospects of their intended appeal. The respondent's concerns about loss of use of his property were noted, but the court ultimately found no merit in the application for stay. Consequently, the application was dismissed without orders as to costs.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for stay of execution is dismissed.
  • There shall be no orders as to costs.