Ahmed v Mwambire & 4 others (Environment and Land Appeal E065 of 2025) [2026] KEELC 2082 (KLR) (14 April 2026) (Ruling)
It is in the interests of justice and judicial efficiency to preserve the suit property in its current state pending hearing and determination of the appeal.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2026] KEELC 2082 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Mohamed Hashi Ahmed; Respondent: Charity Dama Mwambire; Respondent: Emmanuel Kadenge; Interested Party: Ramadhan Shombo; Interested Party: Joab Katana; Interested Party: Meja Kiti Kalu
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment and Land Appeal E065 of 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Ruling on Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- application for stay of execution allowed
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Title Cancellation, Injunctive Relief, Preservation of Property
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mohamed Hashi Ahmed
Appellant
Charity Dama Mwambire
Respondent
Emmanuel Kadenge
Respondent
Ramadhan Shombo
Interested Party
Joab Katana
Interested Party
Meja Kiti Kalu
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Ruling on Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 whether to grant stay of execution of judgment cancelling appellant's title
- 2 whether to preserve suit property pending appeal
Ratio Decidendi
It is in the interests of justice and judicial efficiency to preserve the suit property in its current state pending hearing and determination of the appeal.
Court Disposition
application for stay of execution allowed
Orders
- suit property to be preserved in its present state pending hearing and disposal of appeal
- costs of application to be costs in the appeal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT MALINDI ELCLA NO. E065 OF 2025 MOHAMED HASHI AHMED ………..……..………………………… .…. APPELLANT VERSUS ………….….…………..………… 1ST CHARITY DAMA MWAMBIRE RESPONDENT EMMANUEL KADENGE RESPONDENT …………………………………………... 2ND And RAMADHAN SHOMBO ………………………………..……1ST INTERESTED PARTY JOAB KATANA ………………………………..………..……2ND INTERESTED PARTY MEJA KITI KALU ……………………………………………3RD INTERESTED PARTY RULING 1. The Notice of Motion dated 7th November 2025 is seeking stay of execution of the subordinate court’s judgment delivered on 5th November 2025 in Malindi Land Case Number E0062 Of 2023. The application is supported by the sworn affidavit of the applicant, also dated 7th November 2025. 2. The applicant states that judgment was delivered in favour of the defendants and the interested parties in that case; that the subject matter in the suit was encroachment, alienation and/or trespass into the plaintiff’s land Parcel Number Kilifi/Jimba/1141. However, his defense in the matter had been that he purchased the suit land in 2009 while there was a permanent dwelling house thereon, and that he proceeded to erect other permanent houses, and has been in occupation of the suit property without any interruption. He avers that the respondents and the interested parties do not live on the suit property and do not hold any title to the land, and that they began encroaching of the suit property in the year 2023, prompting him to file the case in the subordinate court seeking injunctive orders against them. The respondents and the interested parties MLDELCLOME001/26-RLG/DF-16.01.26/FH-03.11.25/LH-03.02.26/DR-14.04.26F. Page 1 of 3 made a counterclaim in their defence, seeking cancellation of the applicant’s title, and the trial court ordered for cancellation of the applicant’s title. The applicant states that if the judgment is not stayed, then the respondents may apply for cancellation of the applicant title and may proceed to demolish the applicant’s residential house which is the only family dwelling house; that it is in the interests of justice that the execution of the judgment be stayed. 3. The 1st respondent opposed the application through her replying affidavit dated 12th January 2026, wondering why it is only at the present juncture that the applicant sees the need to introduce a purchase agreement which was never part of the lower court proceedings and which action she terms irregular; that her claim to the land is genuine and that she has a permanent structure surrounded by a brick wall on the suit property. 4. The application was disposed of by way of written submissions. Both the appellant and the respondent filed submissions dated 28/1/2026 and 3/2/2026 respectively, which the court has considered in the preparation of this ruling. 5. I have considered that today record of appearance already been filed in this matter and the appeal is awaiting directions as to hearing. 6. In the circumstances I find that it will be better for the sake of valuable judicial time at this juncture and in the stated circumstances that an order be issued that the suit property be preserved in its present state pending the hearing and disposal of the appeal and I dispose of the application dated 7th November 2025 by issuing the following orders: a. The motion dated 7th November 2025 is allowed in terms of prayer number (c) thereof; b. The costs of the application shall be costs in the appeal; MLDELCLOME001/26-RLG/DF-16.01.26/FH-03.11.25/LH-03.02.26/DR-14.04.26F. Page 2 of 3 c. The Deputy Registrar of this court shall available the lower Court file record and the appeal shall be mentioned for issuance of directions as to hearing on 21st May 2026. Dated, signed and delivered at Malindi on this 14th Day of April, 2026. MWANGI NJOROGE, JUDGE, ELC, MALINDI. MLDELCLOME001/26-RLG/DF-16.01.26/FH-03.11.25/LH-03.02.26/DR-14.04.26F. Page 3 of 3