[2002] KECA 54 (KLR)

[2002] KECA 54 (KLR)

The application was not determined on its merits. The matter was stood over generally due to the indisposition of Mr K'Owade, with no order as to costs. No substantive legal reasoning or principle was applied as the application was not heard.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2002] KECA 54 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Mohamed Omari Shuguli; Appellant: Mohamed Rashid Bakuli; Respondent: Anne Ngiana Rama
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application 391 of 2001
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Notice and Record of Appeal
Outcome
application stood over generally with no order as to costs
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeals Process
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Appeals Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mohamed Omari Shuguli

Appellant

Mohamed Rashid Bakuli

Appellant

Anne Ngiana Rama

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Notice and Record of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the application for extension of time to file notice and record of appeal out of time should be granted.

Ratio Decidendi

The application was not determined on its merits. The matter was stood over generally due to the indisposition of Mr K'Owade, with no order as to costs. No substantive legal reasoning or principle was applied as the application was not heard.

Court Disposition

application stood over generally with no order as to costs

Orders

  • The application is stood over generally.
  • No order as to costs.