[2019] KEELC 4504 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 4504 (KLR)

The plaintiff proved ownership of the suit property by producing an indenture of sale and evidence of registration. The defendants, having failed to appear or defend the suit, left the plaintiff's evidence uncontroverted. The court found that the defendants unlawfully entered and occupied the plaintiff's land...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELC 4504 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Mohamed Osman Noor; Defendant: Charo Kazungu; Defendant: Fatuma Mwandoro; Defendant: Kitunga Zawadi; Defendant: Mwalimu Karisa Mangi; Defendant: Sulubi Karisa Mangi; Defendant: Mangi Karisa Kitunga; Defendant: Kazungu Mangi Kitunga
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Malindi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 286 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Land and Property Suit / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the plaintiff
Judges
JO Olola
Legal Topics
Trespass to Land, Eviction, Ownership of Land
Source Language
en
Land and Property Trespass to Land Eviction Ownership of Land

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mohamed Osman Noor

Plaintiff

Charo Kazungu

Defendant

Fatuma Mwandoro

Defendant

Kitunga Zawadi

Defendant

Mwalimu Karisa Mangi

Defendant

Sulubi Karisa Mangi

Defendant

Mangi Karisa Kitunga

Defendant

Kazungu Mangi Kitunga

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land and Property Suit / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is the lawful owner of the suit property.
  2. 2 Whether the defendants unlawfully entered and occupied the plaintiff's land.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to orders of eviction and costs.

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff proved ownership of the suit property by producing an indenture of sale and evidence of registration. The defendants, having failed to appear or defend the suit, left the plaintiff's evidence uncontroverted. The court found that the defendants unlawfully entered and occupied the plaintiff's land without any justifiable cause, constituting trespass. As the absolute proprietor, the plaintiff is entitled to exclusive possession and enjoyment of the property. The court therefore granted judgment for the plaintiff, including orders for eviction, costs, and interest as prayed.

Court Disposition

judgment for the plaintiff

Orders

  • The defendants shall be forcefully evicted from the suit premises (Plot No. 7652, Mtangani Village, Malindi).
  • The defendants shall pay the costs of the suit.