[2024] KEHC 13612 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant was arrested on 24 September 2022 and sentenced on 20 September 2023, having spent approximately 11 months, 3 weeks, and 4 days in lawful custody prior to sentencing. Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code and the Judiciary Sentencing Policy Guidelines mandate that such...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 13612 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Khadar Yussuf Mohamed; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Garissa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application E015 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Sentence Computation
- Outcome
- Application allowed. Period spent in remand custody to be deducted from sentence.
- Judges
- JN Onyiego
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Pretrial Custody Credit, Sentence Review, Penal Code Section 223, Criminal Procedure Code Section 333 2
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Khadar Yussuf Mohamed
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Sentence Computation
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to have the period spent in pre-sentence custody deducted from his sentence under Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant was arrested on 24 September 2022 and sentenced on 20 September 2023, having spent approximately 11 months, 3 weeks, and 4 days in lawful custody prior to sentencing. Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code and the Judiciary Sentencing Policy Guidelines mandate that such pre-sentence custody must be deducted from the total sentence imposed. The court held that failure to do so would result in an excessive and disproportionate punishment. Accordingly, the period spent in remand custody must be deducted from the applicant's three-year sentence.
Court Disposition
Application allowed. Period spent in remand custody to be deducted from sentence.
Orders
- The period of 11 months, 3 weeks, and 4 days spent in remand custody by the applicant shall be deducted from the three-year sentence imposed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
Mohamed v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E015 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 13612 (KLR) (7 November 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 13612 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Garissa
Miscellaneous Criminal Application E015 of 2024
JN Onyiego, J
November 7, 2024
Between
Khadar Yussuf Mohamed
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
Ruling
1. The applicant herein was charged and convicted for the offence of threatening to kill contrary to section 223(1) of the Penal Code and sentenced to 3 years’ imprisonment.
2. The applicant has approached this court with an undated chamber summons seeking for orders that his sentence be deemed to have started from the time he was arrested and that he be present during the hearing of the suit. The application is supported by an annexed affidavit referenced as ‘humble mitigation’ where the applicant stated that upon being found guilty, he was convicted and thereafter sentenced to three years imprisonment.
3. He averred that he has since served two years and therefore a transformed citizen who is ready to join society. He urged that he has undertaken religious classes and therefore, fully transformed. He stated that he was arrested sometime in the month of September, 2022 and spent 11 months in lawful custody before he was sentenced. He prayed that the time spent in custody be included in computation of his sentence.
4. In view of his prayer, the only issue for determination is whether the applicant is entitled to review of sentence under Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
5. Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code provides: -“Subject to the provisions of Section 38 of the Penal Code, every sentence shall be deemed to commence from and to include the whole of the day of, the date on which it was pronounced, except where otherwise provided in this Code. Provided that where the person sentenced under sub section (1) has, prior to such sentence, been held in custody, the sentence shall take account of the period spent in custody.”[ Also see the case in Ahamad Abolfathi Mohammed & Another vs Republic [2018] Eklr].
6. Similarly, according to The Judiciary Sentencing Policy Guidelines: “The provision to section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code obligates the court to take into account the time already spent in remand custody if the convicted person had been in custody during the trial. Failure to do so impacts on the overall period of detention which may result in an excessive punishment that is not proportional to the offence committed.
7. The applicant herein was arrested on 24. 09. 2022 and sentenced on 20. 09. 2023. Notably, the applicant spent a period of 11 months, 3 weeks and 4days in a lawful custody which in my view ought to be accounted for. As such, I concur that the same ought to be deducted from the three year sentence. Accordingly, the period spent in remand custody shall be deducted when computing sentence.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY THIS 7TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2024J. N. ONYIEGOJUDGE