[2023] KEELC 22372 (KLR)

[2023] KEELC 22372 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had satisfied all procedural requirements for the recognition and enforcement of the arbitral award. There was no evidence or argument presented by the respondent to challenge the award or to invoke any of the statutory grounds for refusal under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELC 22372 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Muhyadin Mohamed; Respondent: Riverpoint Development Limited
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Judgment Date
8 December 2023
Case Number
Environment and Land Civil Miscellaneous Application E024 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Award
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
MD Mwangi
Legal Topics
Arbitral Award Enforcement, Recognition of Awards, Grounds for Refusal, Public Policy Exception
Source Language
english
Alternative Dispute Resolution Civil Procedure Arbitral Award Enforcement Recognition of Awards Grounds for Refusal Public Policy Exception

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Muhyadin Mohamed

Applicant

Riverpoint Development Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Award

  1. 1 Whether the arbitral award delivered on 11th November 2022 should be recognized, adopted, and enforced as a judgment of the court.
  2. 2 Whether there exist any grounds under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act to refuse enforcement of the arbitral award.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had satisfied all procedural requirements for the recognition and enforcement of the arbitral award. There was no evidence or argument presented by the respondent to challenge the award or to invoke any of the statutory grounds for refusal under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act. The court, upon reviewing the application and the arbitral award, found no reason to decline enforcement. Accordingly, the arbitral award delivered on 11th November 2022 was recognized, adopted, and enforced as a judgment of the court, with leave granted to the applicant to enforce it as a decree. The applicant was directed to present a duly certified copy of the award to the...

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The arbitral award dated and delivered on 11th November 2022 by Cecil L. Kuyo is recognized, adopted, and enforced as a judgment of the court.
  • Leave is granted to the applicant to enforce the arbitral award as a decree of the court.