[2018] KEHC 810 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 810 (KLR)

The High Court determined that it lacked jurisdiction to hear and determine the dispute, as the matter concerned land (specifically, title No. LR 209/4300/161). The enactment of the Environment and Land Court Act and the provisions of Articles 162(2) and 165(5) of the Constitution divested the High Court of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 810 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Mohamed Yunis Soroya; Respondent: Mohamed Yusuf Khan Soroya; Respondent: Soroya Group Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application 116 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time and Stay of Execution
Outcome
file transferred to the Environment and Land Court for hearing and disposal
Judges
A Mbogholi-Msagha
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction of Courts, Transfer of Suit, Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Stay of Execution
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Jurisdiction of Courts Transfer of Suit Leave to Appeal Out of Time Stay of Execution

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mohamed Yunis Soroya

Applicant

Mohamed Yusuf Khan Soroya

Respondent

Soroya Group Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time and Stay of Execution

  1. 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine disputes relating to land under the current legal framework.
  2. 2 Whether the application for leave to appeal out of time and stay of execution can be entertained by the High Court.

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court determined that it lacked jurisdiction to hear and determine the dispute, as the matter concerned land (specifically, title No. LR 209/4300/161). The enactment of the Environment and Land Court Act and the provisions of Articles 162(2) and 165(5) of the Constitution divested the High Court of jurisdiction over such matters. Consequently, the court could not entertain the application for leave to appeal out of time or for stay of execution. The appropriate course was to transfer the file to the Environment and Land Court for hearing and determination.

Court Disposition

file transferred to the Environment and Land Court for hearing and disposal

Orders

  • The file is transferred to the Environment and Land Court Division for hearing and disposal of the dispute.