[2024] KECA 580 (KLR)
The Court found that both the applicant and the 1st respondent had died and no applications for substitution had been made within the prescribed period. Under Rule 102 of the Court of Appeal Rules, if no substitution occurs within twelve months of a party's death, the appeal abates. Since no legal representative had...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KECA 580 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Mohammed Azhar s/o Mohamed Akram; Respondent: Hardev Kalsi Singh; Respondent: The Estate of Ilam Din s/o Ilam Dim (Deceased); Respondent: The Estate of Mohammed Aslam s/o Ilam Din (Deceased); Respondent: Asgiri d/o Ilam Din; Respondent: Mohammed Akhtar
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal (Application) 23 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Stay of Execution; Determination of Abatement Due to Death of Parties
- Outcome
- Application and appeal abated due to death of parties and lack of substitution.
- Judges
- DK Musinga, MSA Makhandia, S ole Kantai
- Legal Topics
- Abatement of Appeal, Substitution of Parties, Stay of Execution, Revival of Appeal
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mohammed Azhar s/o Mohamed Akram
Applicant
Hardev Kalsi Singh
Respondent
The Estate of Ilam Din s/o Ilam Dim (Deceased)
Respondent
The Estate of Mohammed Aslam s/o Ilam Din (Deceased)
Respondent
Asgiri d/o Ilam Din
Respondent
Mohammed Akhtar
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Stay of Execution; Determination of Abatement Due to Death of Parties
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal and application have abated due to the death of the appellant and respondent without substitution.
- 2 Whether any party has locus standi to prosecute or revive the appeal in the absence of substitution.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that both the applicant and the 1st respondent had died and no applications for substitution had been made within the prescribed period. Under Rule 102 of the Court of Appeal Rules, if no substitution occurs within twelve months of a party's death, the appeal abates. Since no legal representative had been substituted for either the appellant or the 1st respondent, and the application had already been marked as abated, the Court held that the appeal and the pending application had abated by operation of law. The Court further held that Ms. Farah Azhar, being neither a party nor a substituted legal representative, lacked locus standi to prosecute or revive the appeal or...
Court Disposition
Application and appeal abated due to death of parties and lack of substitution.
Orders
- The application and appeal are marked as abated.
- Legal representatives may apply for revival of the appeal if they so wish.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
29 paragraphs
Mohammed Azhar s/o Mohamed Akram v Singh & 4 others (Civil Appeal (Application) 23 of 2019) [2024] KECA 580 (KLR) (24 May 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KECA 580 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Civil Appeal (Application) 23 of 2019
DK Musinga, MSA Makhandia & S ole Kantai, JJA
May 24, 2024
Between
Mohammed Azhar s/o Mohamed Akram
Applicant
and
Hardev Kalsi Singh
1st Respondent
The Estate of Ilam Din s/o Ilam Dim (Deceased)
2nd Respondent
The Estate of Mohammed Aslam s/o Ilam Din (Deceased)
3rd Respondent
Asgiri d/o Ilam Din
4th Respondent
Mohammed Akhtar
5th Respondent
(An application from the Judgment and Decree of the Environment and Land Court at Nairobi (Mutungi, J.) delivered on 23rd July 2015 in ELC Case No. 186 of 2012 (OS) ? 186 of 2012 )
Ruling
1. This ruling is in respect of the applicant’s notice of motion dated January 28, 2019, which seeks an order of stay of execution of the judgment and decree issued by the Environment and Land Court (ELC) (Mutungi, J.), on July 23, 2015.
2. When the application came up for hearing on June 21, 2023 before Okwengu, Mativo & Ngenye-Macharia, JJ.A., the applicant was not in attendance. The Court was informed by the 1st respondent’s advocate that the 1st respondent was dead and no application for substitution had been made. Consequently, the Court marked the application as having abated.
3. Despite the aforesaid order, the application was again listed for hearing on May 6, 2024. On that day, Ms. Farah Azhar, a relative of the applicant/appellant, was in attendance. She told the Court that the appellant had also passed away. He died on March 8, 2021. There was no indication that any substitution had been done, and in any event, the application had already been marked as having abated.
4. Rule 102 of this Court’s Rules provides as follows:“102. (1)An appeal shall not abate on the death of the appellant or respondent but the court shall, on the application of any interested person, cause the legal representative of the deceased person to be made a party in place of the deceased.2. If no application is made under sub-rule (1) within twelve months from the date of the death of the appellant or respondent, the appeal shall abate.3. The person claiming to be the legal representative of a deceased party or an interested party to an appeal may apply for an order to revive an appeal which has abated and, if it is proved that the legal representative was prevented by sufficient cause from continuing the appeal, the court shall revive the appeal upon such terms as to costs or otherwise as it deems fit.4. An application under sub rule (3) may be made before a single judge.”
5. In view of the foregoing, it is clear that this appeal has abated.The legal representatives of the deceased persons are however at liberty to apply for an order to revive the appeal, if they so wish. Ms. Farah Azhar does not have locus standi to prosecute the appeal or the pending application since she had not been substituted for the deceased appellant.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 24TH DAY OF MAY 2024. D. K. MUSINGA, (P).....................JUDGE OF APPEALASIKE-MAKHANDIA.....................JUDGE OF APPEALS. ole KANTAI.....................JUDGE OF APPEALI certify that this is a true copy of the originalSIGNEDDEPUTY REGISTRAR