[2001] KEHC 577 (KLR)

[2001] KEHC 577 (KLR)

The court found that the Defendants fraudulently transferred the suit land to themselves while the Plaintiff was in occupation and custody. The Defendants' criminal conviction for offences relating to the fraudulent transfer was conclusive evidence of fraud. As a result, the court held that no valid title could pass...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2001] KEHC 577 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Mohammed Hanif; Defendant: Justus Nyamu & Another
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 2247 of 1999
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Judgment
Outcome
judgment_for_plaintiff
Legal Topics
Fraudulent Transfer of Land, Cancellation of Title, Land Registration, Criminal Conviction Effects
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Fraudulent Transfer of Land Cancellation of Title Land Registration Criminal Conviction Effects

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mohammed Hanif

Plaintiff

Justus Nyamu & Another

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Defendants fraudulently transferred the suit land to themselves.
  2. 2 Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to cancellation of the entries made on the title documents of the suit land.
  3. 3 Whether the criminal conviction of the Defendant affects the validity of the title transfer.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Defendants fraudulently transferred the suit land to themselves while the Plaintiff was in occupation and custody. The Defendants' criminal conviction for offences relating to the fraudulent transfer was conclusive evidence of fraud. As a result, the court held that no valid title could pass to the Defendants or any other person, and the entries made on the title documents were void. The Plaintiff's claim for cancellation of the fraudulent entries was therefore well founded, and judgment was entered in favour of the Plaintiff as prayed in the Plaint. The Registrar was ordered to cancel the impugned entries in the land register.

Court Disposition

judgment_for_plaintiff

Orders

  • The entries in question appearing in the Register of lands relating to the suit land are cancelled.
  • The Registrar shall act accordingly to effect the cancellation.