[2018] KEELC 719 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 719 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiffs instituted the matter as representatives of several others but did not plead a trust. However, the issues raised regarding locus standi and representation are matters that require evidence and cannot be conclusively determined at the preliminary objection stage. The court held...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELC 719 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Mohammed Kweya Ojuok & 6 Others; Defendant: County Government of Kakamega; Defendant: Abdallah Ali Saghar; Defendant: Saida Abbas Hassan; Defendant: Mumias Nubian Community; Defendant: Hon. Attorney General
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 31 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Objection / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome
preliminary objection dismissed with costs
Judges
NA Matheka
Legal Topics
Locus Standi, Representative Suits, Preliminary Objection, Ownership of Land
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Locus Standi Representative Suits Preliminary Objection Ownership of Land

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mohammed Kweya Ojuok & 6 Others

Plaintiff

County Government of Kakamega

Defendant

Abdallah Ali Saghar

Defendant

Saida Abbas Hassan

Defendant

Mumias Nubian Community

Defendant

Hon. Attorney General

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Preliminary Objection / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiffs have locus standi to bring the suit as representatives of others.
  2. 2 Whether the absence of a pleaded trust or clarity on representation invalidates the suit at the preliminary stage.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiffs instituted the matter as representatives of several others but did not plead a trust. However, the issues raised regarding locus standi and representation are matters that require evidence and cannot be conclusively determined at the preliminary objection stage. The court held that the preliminary objection did not raise pure points of law but rather issues that should be addressed during the hearing of the suit. Consequently, the preliminary objection was found to lack merit and was dismissed with costs to the plaintiffs.

Court Disposition

preliminary objection dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The preliminary objection is dismissed with costs to the plaintiffs.