[2024] KEELC 872 (KLR)

[2024] KEELC 872 (KLR)

The court found that the boundary position of Marsabit/Jirme/572 had already been determined and beacons placed by the Chief Land Registration Officer, as confirmed by both the officer and the plaintiff. Since the substantive relief sought by the plaintiff had been satisfied prior to judgment, there was no longer a...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEELC 872 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Abdinassir Abdirahim Mohammed; Defendant: Lawrence Daniel Kiriinya; Defendant: The County Surveyor Isiolo County Government
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Isiolo
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case E002 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case / Judgment
Outcome
suit marked as closed; no order as to costs
Judges
PM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Boundary Determination, Land Registration, Beacon Placement
Source Language
en
Land and Property Boundary Determination Land Registration Beacon Placement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Abdinassir Abdirahim Mohammed

Plaintiff

Lawrence Daniel Kiriinya

Defendant

The County Surveyor Isiolo County Government

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Environment and Land Case / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the boundary position of Marsabit/Jirme/572 should be determined and beacons placed as requested by the plaintiff.
  2. 2 Whether there are any outstanding issues after the Chief Land Registration Officer's report.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the boundary position of Marsabit/Jirme/572 had already been determined and beacons placed by the Chief Land Registration Officer, as confirmed by both the officer and the plaintiff. Since the substantive relief sought by the plaintiff had been satisfied prior to judgment, there was no longer a live dispute for the court to determine. Accordingly, the court marked the file as closed and made no order as to costs.

Court Disposition

suit marked as closed; no order as to costs

Orders

  • This file is marked closed.
  • No order as to costs.