[2000] KECA 253 (KLR)

[2000] KECA 253 (KLR)

The court found that the affidavit sworn by Mrs Rodrigues, the advocate on record for the appellants, did not constitute sufficient cause for her failure to appear when the appeal was called. The court noted that the explanation provided was hollow and unsupported by any affidavit from the clerk who was allegedly...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2000] KECA 253 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Mohammed Yakub & Mohammed Yusuf T/A Yasser Butchery; Respondent: Mrs Badur Nasa Saidi Nashean Robert M. Chege T/A Covenant Auctioneers
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 211 of 1998
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Restoration of Appeal After Dismissal for Non Appearance
Outcome
Application to restore the appeal dismissed with costs to the respondents.
Legal Topics
Restoration of Appeal, Dismissal for Non Appearance, Sufficient Cause, Advocate Neglect
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Restoration of Appeal Dismissal for Non Appearance Sufficient Cause Advocate Neglect

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mohammed Yakub & Mohammed Yusuf T/A Yasser Butchery

Appellant

Mrs Badur Nasa Saidi Nashean Robert M. Chege T/A Covenant Auctioneers

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Application for Restoration of Appeal After Dismissal for Non Appearance

  1. 1 Whether the appellants have shown sufficient cause for non-appearance to warrant restoration of the dismissed appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the omission of the advocate on record should be visited upon the client in the circumstances.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the affidavit sworn by Mrs Rodrigues, the advocate on record for the appellants, did not constitute sufficient cause for her failure to appear when the appeal was called. The court noted that the explanation provided was hollow and unsupported by any affidavit from the clerk who was allegedly responsible for the failure to instruct the advocate leading Mrs Rodrigues. The court held that this was not a case where the omission of the advocate should not be visited upon the client. Consequently, the application to restore the appeal was dismissed with costs to the respondents.

Court Disposition

Application to restore the appeal dismissed with costs to the respondents.

Orders

  • The application to restore the appeal is dismissed.
  • Costs awarded to the respondents.