[2015] KEELRC 279 (KLR)

[2015] KEELRC 279 (KLR)

The court found that the Applicant's date of birth, as evidenced by his National ID and birth certificate, was 18th May 1956. The 1st Respondent's decision to retire the Applicant based on an incorrect date of birth was made in error. The Respondents did not contest the Applicant's evidence or submissions. The court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEELRC 279 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Mohamoud Hussein Abdi; Respondent: Commissioner General of Prisons; Respondent: Attorney General
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review 15 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment
Outcome
Application granted as prayed.
Legal Topics
Compulsory Retirement Age, Public Service Employment, Judicial Review Remedies
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Compulsory Retirement Age Public Service Employment Judicial Review Remedies

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mohamoud Hussein Abdi

Applicant

Commissioner General of Prisons

Respondent

Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the 1st Respondent's decision to retire the Applicant was based on the correct date of birth.
  2. 2 Whether the Applicant is entitled to judicial review orders of certiorari and prohibition against the Respondents.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Applicant's date of birth, as evidenced by his National ID and birth certificate, was 18th May 1956. The 1st Respondent's decision to retire the Applicant based on an incorrect date of birth was made in error. The Respondents did not contest the Applicant's evidence or submissions. The court held that the Applicant was entitled to judicial review orders of certiorari to quash the impugned retirement decision and prohibition to restrain the Respondents from enforcing the erroneous decision. The court further directed that the Applicant's due retirement date is 18th May 2016, when he would attain the mandatory retirement age of 60 years.

Court Disposition

Application granted as prayed.

Orders

  • An order of certiorari is issued to quash the decision of the 1st Respondent retiring the Applicant by letter dated 13th November 2013.
  • An order of prohibition is issued restraining the Respondents from enforcing the impugned retirement decision.