[2016] KEHC 5873 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 5873 (KLR)

The court determined that, in the interest of justice and to ensure all parties are adequately heard, interim orders previously granted should be extended. Directions were issued allowing the 2nd respondent additional time to prepare and highlight its submissions, and all parties were permitted to file concise...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEHC 5873 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Mohamud Iltarakwa Kochale; Plaintiff: Kochale Somo Chale; Plaintiff: Issa Jitewe Gambare; Plaintiff: David Tamasot Arakhole; Plaintiff: William Lengoyiap; Plaintiff: Sekotey Seye; Defendant: Lake Turkana Wind Power Ltd; Defendant: Marsabit County Government; Defendant: The Attorney General; Defendant: Chief Land Registrar; Defendant: The National Land Commission; Interested Party: Aaron Iltele Lesiantam; Interested Party: Henry Parasian Sakalpo; Interested Party: Stephen Nakeno; Interested Party: Job Lmalasian Lengoya; Interested Party: Dair Lentipan
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit 163 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Directions on Hearing of Notice of Motion Application Dated 14.10.2014
Outcome
Directions issued for hearing of notice of motion; interim orders extended.
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Land Disputes, Interim Orders, Notice of Motion, Environmental Impact, Community Rights
Source Language
en
Land and Property Land Disputes Interim Orders Notice of Motion Environmental Impact Community Rights

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mohamud Iltarakwa Kochale

Plaintiff

Kochale Somo Chale

Plaintiff

Issa Jitewe Gambare

Plaintiff

David Tamasot Arakhole

Plaintiff

William Lengoyiap

Plaintiff

Sekotey Seye

Plaintiff

Lake Turkana Wind Power Ltd

Defendant

Marsabit County Government

Defendant

The Attorney General

Defendant

Chief Land Registrar

Defendant

The National Land Commission

Defendant

Aaron Iltele Lesiantam

Interested Party

Henry Parasian Sakalpo

Interested Party

Stephen Nakeno

Interested Party

Job Lmalasian Lengoya

Interested Party

Dair Lentipan

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Directions on Hearing of Notice of Motion Application Dated 14.10.2014

  1. 1 Whether interim orders should be extended pending the hearing of the notice of motion application.
  2. 2 What directions should be given for the hearing and submissions on the DR's report.
  3. 3 Whether all parties should be allowed to file further submissions.

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that, in the interest of justice and to ensure all parties are adequately heard, interim orders previously granted should be extended. Directions were issued allowing the 2nd respondent additional time to prepare and highlight its submissions, and all parties were permitted to file concise submissions on the DR's report. The court emphasized the need for procedural fairness and efficient management of the proceedings, setting a clear timeline for the next steps and reserving a date for further directions and the pronouncement of a ruling.

Court Disposition

Directions issued for hearing of notice of motion; interim orders extended.

Orders

  • 2nd respondent allowed to highlight submissions on 23/05/2016.
  • All parties allowed to file 2-page submissions on the DR's report 10 days before next mention date.