[2017] KEELC 3360 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 3360 (KLR)

The court found that, given the logistical challenges faced by the applicants and the need for compliance with previous orders, the application for extension of time was sufficiently urgent to warrant certification. The court exercised its discretion to set an expedited hearing date and directed the applicants to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELC 3360 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Mohamud Iltarakwa Kochale; Applicant: Kochale Somo Chale; Applicant: Issa Jitewe Gambare; Applicant: David Tamasot Arakhole; Applicant: William Lengoyiap; Applicant: Sekotey Seye; Respondent: Lake Turkana Wind Power Ltd; Respondent: Marsabit County Government; Respondent: The Attorney General; Respondent: Chief Land Registrar; Respondent: The National Land Commission; Respondent: Aaron Iltele Lesiantam; Respondent: Henry Parasian Sakalpo; Respondent: Stephen Nakeno; Respondent: Job Lmalasian Lengoya; Respondent: Dair Lentipan
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit 163 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
Application certified as urgent; directions given for hearing and service.
Judges
LN Mbugua
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Court Orders Compliance, Urgent Applications
Source Language
en
Land and Property Extension of Time Court Orders Compliance Urgent Applications

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mohamud Iltarakwa Kochale

Applicant

Kochale Somo Chale

Applicant

Issa Jitewe Gambare

Applicant

David Tamasot Arakhole

Applicant

William Lengoyiap

Applicant

Sekotey Seye

Applicant

Lake Turkana Wind Power Ltd

Respondent

Marsabit County Government

Respondent

The Attorney General

Respondent

Chief Land Registrar

Respondent

The National Land Commission

Respondent

Aaron Iltele Lesiantam

Respondent

Henry Parasian Sakalpo

Respondent

Stephen Nakeno

Respondent

Job Lmalasian Lengoya

Respondent

Dair Lentipan

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicants should be granted an extension of time to comply with the court's orders of 09.11.16.
  2. 2 Whether the application should be certified as urgent and directions given for hearing.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, given the logistical challenges faced by the applicants and the need for compliance with previous orders, the application for extension of time was sufficiently urgent to warrant certification. The court exercised its discretion to set an expedited hearing date and directed the applicants to notify all parties using the fastest available communication methods, including email.

Court Disposition

Application certified as urgent; directions given for hearing and service.

Orders

  • The application is certified as urgent.
  • Application to be heard on 13.03.17.