[2023] KEHC 24737 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had complied with all statutory requirements for recognition and adoption of the arbitral award under the Arbitration Act. There was no pending application to set aside the award, as the respondent's application had been dismissed for want of prosecution and no appeal or...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 24737 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Mohawk Limited; Defendant: Leo Investments Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Suit 295 of 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit / Ruling on Application for Recognition and Adoption of Arbitral Award
- Outcome
- application for recognition and adoption of arbitral award allowed
- Judges
- JWW Mong'are
- Legal Topics
- Arbitral Award Recognition, Arbitration Act Section 36, Arbitration Act Section 37, Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mohawk Limited
Plaintiff
Leo Investments Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Application for Recognition and Adoption of Arbitral Award
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the arbitral award issued on 11th August 2011 should be recognised and adopted as a judgment and decree of the court.
- 2 Whether there are any pending applications or appeals that would bar the adoption of the arbitral award.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had complied with all statutory requirements for recognition and adoption of the arbitral award under the Arbitration Act. There was no pending application to set aside the award, as the respondent's application had been dismissed for want of prosecution and no appeal or application for reinstatement was pending. The court was satisfied that the applicant was entitled to have the arbitral award recognised and adopted as a judgment and decree of the court. The court further ordered that each party bear its own costs due to the protracted nature of the proceedings.
Court Disposition
application for recognition and adoption of arbitral award allowed
Orders
- The arbitral award issued by Hon. Retired Justice Togbor on 11th August 2011 is recognised and adopted as a judgment and decree of the court.
- Each party shall bear its own costs of the application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
Mohawk Limited v Leo Investments Limited (Civil Suit 295 of 2008) [2023] KEHC 24737 (KLR) (Commercial and Tax) (30 October 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 24737 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Commercial and Tax
Civil Suit 295 of 2008
JWW Mong'are, J
October 30, 2023
Between
Mohawk Limited
Plaintiff
and
Leo Investments Limited
Defendant
Ruling
1. Before this court is an application dated 24th May 2013 filed by the Plaintiff/Applicant under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act of the Arbitration Act, 1995 seeking that this honourable court do recognise and adopt the Arbitral Award issued on 11th August 2011 by the sole Arbitrator, Hon. Retired Justice E. Togbor as judgment and decree of this court.
2. The Applicant argues that upon filing the final Arbitral Award that was issued in its favour, the Respondent on 9th November 2011 filed an application to set aside the said arbitral award but failed to prosecute the said application since. The said application was subsequently dismissed on application by the court on 11th October 2012. Subsequently the Respondent moved to the Constitutional Court to have its application reinstated and heard first but took no action to fix the same for hearing. Subsequently and as a result of failure by the Applicant to prosecute its application the same was dismissed by the court for want of prosecution on 24th September 2018 on its own motion.
3. An application to reinstate the suit was allowed by the court on 21st March 2022 was allowed and since the Respondent has not lodged an appeal to contest the dismissal of its application, the Applicant seeks that the court do recognise and adopt the arbitral award of 11th August 2011 issued by Hon. Retired Justice Togbor as a judgment and decree of the court in accordance with Section 32 of the Arbitration Act. The Applicant has complied with the provisions of Section 36 of the Arbitration Act by availing to this court the original Arbitral Award signed by the Sole Arbitrator on 11th August 2011 and the Arbitration Agreement.
4. The Court notes that there is no pending application to set aside the arbitral award under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act as the same was dismissed for want of prosecution by the court. There is no pending Application to reinstate the dismissed application and no pending Appeal on the same.
5. Flowing from the said observations, the court is satisfied that the Applicant has met the tenets of the Arbitration Act under Section 36 thereto. The application for adoption and recognition of the Arbitral Award issued by the sole arbitrator, Hon. Retired Justice Togbor on 11th August 2011 is hereby recognised and adopted as a judgment and decree of this court.
6. Since the matter has been pending before the courts for the last 11 years, each party is ordered to meet its own costs of the application.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY AT NAIROBI THIS 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2023………………………………..J. W. W. MONG’AREJUDGEIn the Presence of:-1. Mr. Kisaka for the Applicant.2. No appearance for the Respondent.3. Amos - Court Assistant