[2023] KEHC 24737 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 24737 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had complied with all statutory requirements for recognition and adoption of the arbitral award under the Arbitration Act. There was no pending application to set aside the award, as the respondent's application had been dismissed for want of prosecution and no appeal or...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 24737 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Mohawk Limited; Defendant: Leo Investments Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit 295 of 2008
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Application for Recognition and Adoption of Arbitral Award
Outcome
application for recognition and adoption of arbitral award allowed
Judges
JWW Mong'are
Legal Topics
Arbitral Award Recognition, Arbitration Act Section 36, Arbitration Act Section 37, Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Alternative Dispute Resolution Arbitral Award Recognition Arbitration Act Section 36 Arbitration Act Section 37 Dismissal for Want of Prosecution

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mohawk Limited

Plaintiff

Leo Investments Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Ruling on Application for Recognition and Adoption of Arbitral Award

  1. 1 Whether the arbitral award issued on 11th August 2011 should be recognised and adopted as a judgment and decree of the court.
  2. 2 Whether there are any pending applications or appeals that would bar the adoption of the arbitral award.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had complied with all statutory requirements for recognition and adoption of the arbitral award under the Arbitration Act. There was no pending application to set aside the award, as the respondent's application had been dismissed for want of prosecution and no appeal or application for reinstatement was pending. The court was satisfied that the applicant was entitled to have the arbitral award recognised and adopted as a judgment and decree of the court. The court further ordered that each party bear its own costs due to the protracted nature of the proceedings.

Court Disposition

application for recognition and adoption of arbitral award allowed

Orders

  • The arbitral award issued by Hon. Retired Justice Togbor on 11th August 2011 is recognised and adopted as a judgment and decree of the court.
  • Each party shall bear its own costs of the application.