[2023] KEMC 194 (KLR)
The court found that both parties had no intention of salvaging the marriage and that the grounds for divorce, including irretrievable breakdown, adultery, cruelty, and desertion, were sufficiently established. The court relied on section 66 of the Marriage Act, 2014, and relevant case law, emphasizing that marriage...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEMC 194 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: MOKM; Respondent: GGA
- Court
- Magistrate's Court
- Court Station
- Milimani Commercial Chief Magistrate's Courts
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Divorce Cause E952 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- Petition for divorce allowed; marriage dissolved.
- Judges
- JP Aduke
- Legal Topics
- Dissolution of Marriage, Irretrievable Breakdown, Adultery, Cruelty, Desertion
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MOKM
Applicant
GGA
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the marriage between the parties has irretrievably broken down under section 66 of the Marriage Act, 2014.
- 2 Whether the grounds for divorce such as adultery, cruelty, desertion, and irretrievable breakdown have been established.
- 3 Whether the court should grant a decree of divorce and on what terms.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that both parties had no intention of salvaging the marriage and that the grounds for divorce, including irretrievable breakdown, adultery, cruelty, and desertion, were sufficiently established. The court relied on section 66 of the Marriage Act, 2014, and relevant case law, emphasizing that marriage is a voluntary union and the court cannot compel unwilling parties to remain married. Given the high level of antagonism, physical separation, and unequivocal statements from both parties, the court concluded that the marriage had irretrievably broken down and granted the divorce.
Court Disposition
Petition for divorce allowed; marriage dissolved.
Orders
- The marriage between the parties is hereby dissolved.
- Decree nisi to issue and be made absolute in 30 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
MOKM v GGA (Divorce Cause E952 of 2022) [2023] KEMC 194 (KLR) (31 August 2023) (Judgment)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEMC 194 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Milimani Commercial Chief Magistrate's Courts
Divorce Cause E952 of 2022
JP Aduke, SRM
August 31, 2023
Between
MOKM
Petitioner
and
GGA
Respondent
Judgment
1. The Petitioner filed the petition dated 4th August 2022 seeking a divorce on the grounds of irretrievable breakdown of the marriage. Return of service on record shows that the respondent was served with the petition and annexures thereto. The respondent entered appearance and filed an answer to the petition. These proceedings proceeded defended.
2. The brief facts of the case are as contained in the petition and answer to petition on record. In summary, MOKM and GGA solemnized their marriage in Kenya on 20/12/2005 at the Office of the Attorney General. Both the respondent and the petitioner are domiciled in Kenya. They have two issues together from the union as at the date of conclusion of the hearing before this court. The parties have no intentions of salvaging this marriage. The particulars of the grounds for divorce are outlined in the petition and answer to petition as follows:1. Irreconcilable differences /Irretrievable breakdown of the marriage;2. Mental anguish;Answer to Petition1. Adultery;2. Desertion;3. Cruelty;4. Irretrievable breakdown of the marriage
3. At the hearing thereof, the petitioner relied on the petition and pleadings on record as evidence in support of the petition for divorce. Notably, the petitioner averred that the contents of the petition remained true as at the date of the hearing. The petitioner prayed that the petition be allowed as prayed. The respondent equally testified and prayed for an order of divorce.
4. The issue for determination before this court is whether or not the marriage between the parties merits an order of divorce under The Marriage Act, 2014 (hereafter, the Act).
5. The applicable law is s.66 of the Act (dissolution of Civil Marriages) which provides that the court may grant separation or divorce on the following grounds:1. adultery by the other spouse;2. cruelty by the other spouse;3. exceptional depravity by the other spouse;4. desertion by the other spouse for at least 3 years;5. the irretrievable breakdown of the marriage.
6. I have considered the particulars of the grounds outlined in the petition and the answer to petition and how those have contributed to the irretrievable breakdown of the marriage as contemplated under s.66 of the Act. I have also noted the length of physical separation of the couple herein, the high levels of antagonism between the parties and relied on the reasoning of the court in JSM vs ENB[2015]. With respect to intention to salvage the union, I have noted the unequivocal terms of the Petition and Answer to Petition on lack of such intention. The reasoning of the court in ROK v MJB and TPH v NVS 2017 eklr cannot be emphasized enough-“marriage is a voluntary union……this court cannot by any means order or compel the parties to remain married when the petitioner has categorically stated that she wants the same dissolved…” Seeing as this court cannot force two adults to live together when there is no more love between them, I allow the Answer to Petition dated 21st September 2022 on the following terms:1. the marriage between the two be and is hereby dissolved.2. Decree nisi do issue to be made absolute in 30 days.3. This being a family matter, each party to bear their own costs.
ADUKE JEAL PRAXADES ATIENOSENIOR RESIDENT MAGISTRATEJUDGEMENT SIGNED AT NAIROBI THIS 31ST AUGUST 2023 IN THE PRESENCE/ABSENCE OF THE PARTIES AT 9. 30AM.In the presence of:1. Court Assistant: Benjamin Kombe2. Counsel for the Petitioner-3. Counsel for the Respondent: