[2015] KEHC 8502 (KLR)
The High Court found that the subordinate court erred in refusing to set aside the ex-parte judgment, particularly because the judgment awarded special damages that had not been proved, indicating the existence of a valid defence. The appellate court held that the discretion to set aside should have been exercised...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] KEHC 8502 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Mombasa Car Importers Ltd; Respondent: Kennedy Obuya Mbori; Respondent: John Ngunjiri Muthee t/a Tango Auctioneers
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Homa Bay
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal 18 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal_allowed
- Legal Topics
- Setting Aside Ex Parte Judgment, Exercise of Discretion, Special Damages, Appellate Review
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mombasa Car Importers Ltd
Appellant
Kennedy Obuya Mbori
Respondent
John Ngunjiri Muthee t/a Tango Auctioneers
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the subordinate court properly exercised its discretion in declining to set aside the ex-parte judgment.
- 2 Whether the existence of a valid defence justified setting aside the ex-parte judgment.
- 3 Whether special damages were properly awarded despite lack of proof.
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court found that the subordinate court erred in refusing to set aside the ex-parte judgment, particularly because the judgment awarded special damages that had not been proved, indicating the existence of a valid defence. The appellate court held that the discretion to set aside should have been exercised in favour of the appellant, especially given the irregularity in the award of special damages. The appeal was therefore allowed, the ex-parte judgment set aside, and the matter remitted for hearing on the merits, with costs awarded against the appellant for both the subordinate court and the appeal.
Court Disposition
appeal_allowed
Orders
- The judgment of Hon. S.N Makila dated 25th March 2014 is set aside.
- The appellant shall bear costs of the subordinate court assessed at Ksh 20,000 to be paid within 30 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT AT HOMA-BAY
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 18 OF 2014
BETWEEN
MOMBASA CAR IMPORTERS LTD ………………………….…. APPELLANT
AND
KENNEDY OBUYA MBORI ……..……………..……….…. 1ST RESPONDENT
JOHN NGUNJIRI MUTHEE T/A
TANGO AUCTIONEERS …………........................................ 2ND RESPONDENT
(Being an appeal from the Ruling and Order of Hon. L. Mwendwa, RM dated 5th November 2014 at the Senior Principal’s Magistrates Court at Oyugis in Civil Case No. 228 of 2009)
JUDGMENT
This is an appeal from the decision of the subordinate court declining to set aside the ex-parte judgment. The ground for setting aside was that the advocate was engaged in another matter in Kisumu. The learned magistrate found that there was intent to delay the matter and no that no basis had been established to exercise such discretion.
I have considered this matter and borne in mind the principles an appellate court exercises in dealing with an appeal against the exercise of discretion by the subordinate court (see Shah v Mbogo [1967] EA 116) and the respondents’ arguments in opposition to the appeal.
Having looked at the judgment of Hon. S. N. Makila where she stated that special damages were not proved yet she proceeded to make an award of special damages, I am inclined to find that there was valid defence which would have entitled the court to set aside the judgment.
Given the history of the matter and the fact that the appellant is now seeking to set aside ex-parte judgment for the second time, I allow the appeal and now make the following orders:-
The judgment of Hon. S.N Makila dated 25th March 2014 be and is hereby set aside.
The appellant shall bear costs of the subordinate court assessed at Ksh 20,000/= to be paid within 30 days.
The appellant shall bear the costs of this appeal assessed at Kshs. 15,000/= to be paid within 30 days.
The sums deposited in this court shall remain as security and shall only be released subject to the judgment and decree of the subordinate court.
The suit in the subordinate court shall be disposed off within 45 days.
DATED and DELIVERED at HOMA BAY this 25th day of August 2015
D.S. MAJANJA
JUDGE
Mr Kirenga instructed by Kirenga and Company Advocates for the appellant.
Mr Oguttu-Mboya instructed by Oguttu-Mboya and Company Advocates for the respondent.