[2013] KEHC 669 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 669 (KLR)

The court found that the defendant, Jane Kaviti Nzioka, remained in occupation of the suit property after the dissolution of Asia Trans Trading Company, despite having no tenancy or legal right to do so. The court relied on the unchallenged evidence of the plaintiffs and the prior judicial finding in Mbsa HCC No....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEHC 669 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Mombasa Motor Vehicles Sales Ltd; Plaintiff: Roshanzameer Ali Mohamed Kasmani; Plaintiff: Mushtaq Ahmed Ali Mohamed Kasmani; Plaintiff: Kulsumbhai & Ali Mohamed Essa Charitable Trust; Plaintiff: Salim Shamshudeen Essa Kasmani; Plaintiff: Shamshudeen Essa Kasmani; Defendant: Jane Kaviti Nzioka
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit 201 of 2009
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment
Outcome
judgment_for_plaintiff
Judges
MM Kasango
Legal Topics
Mesne Profits, Vacant Possession, Trespass to Land, Eviction Orders
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Mesne Profits Vacant Possession Trespass to Land Eviction Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mombasa Motor Vehicles Sales Ltd

Plaintiff

Roshanzameer Ali Mohamed Kasmani

Plaintiff

Mushtaq Ahmed Ali Mohamed Kasmani

Plaintiff

Kulsumbhai & Ali Mohamed Essa Charitable Trust

Plaintiff

Salim Shamshudeen Essa Kasmani

Plaintiff

Shamshudeen Essa Kasmani

Plaintiff

Jane Kaviti Nzioka

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the defendant is a trespasser on the suit property from June 2007.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to mesne profits and vacant possession of the property.
  3. 3 Whether the defendant has any legal right to remain on the property after dissolution of Asia Trans Trading Company.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the defendant, Jane Kaviti Nzioka, remained in occupation of the suit property after the dissolution of Asia Trans Trading Company, despite having no tenancy or legal right to do so. The court relied on the unchallenged evidence of the plaintiffs and the prior judicial finding in Mbsa HCC No. 260 of 2007, which established that the defendant was not a tenant but merely a director and shareholder of the former tenant company. The court held that the defendant was a trespasser from June 2007 and that the plaintiffs were entitled to both vacant possession and mesne profits for the period of unlawful occupation. The court further ordered eviction in default of compliance...

Court Disposition

judgment_for_plaintiff

Orders

  • The defendant shall give vacant possession of Title Mbsa/Block XIX/125 within seven (7) days from the date of judgment.
  • In default, an order of eviction of the defendant from Mbsa/Block XIX/125 shall issue.