[2020] KEHC 5953 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 5953 (KLR)

The court found that, in the absence of further explanations and clarifications, it was unable to appreciate how the orders dismissing the Objectors' application were capable of execution. Therefore, the court did not grant a stay of execution at this stage but directed that the Respondent be served with the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 5953 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Monica Akomo Odayo; Applicant: Stephen O. Ongoya; Respondent: Ezekiel Odiero Adero
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 3 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Interlocutory Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Outcome
Interlocutory directions issued; no stay of execution granted at this stage.
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Service of Process, Interlocutory Orders
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Stay of Execution Service of Process Interlocutory Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Monica Akomo Odayo

Applicant

Stephen O. Ongoya

Applicant

Ezekiel Odiero Adero

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Interlocutory Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the orders dismissing the Objectors. application are capable of execution.
  2. 2 Whether a stay of execution can be granted in the circumstances.
  3. 3 How service of pleadings and orders should be effected during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, in the absence of further explanations and clarifications, it was unable to appreciate how the orders dismissing the Objectors' application were capable of execution. Therefore, the court did not grant a stay of execution at this stage but directed that the Respondent be served with the application and that further directions would be given after service. The court also directed that service of pleadings and orders be effected via email due to the COVID-19 pandemic, in line with prevailing practice directions.

Court Disposition

Interlocutory directions issued; no stay of execution granted at this stage.

Orders

  • Respondents to be served with the application for stay of execution.
  • Objectors to serve the Petitioner and provide an email address for service of subsequent pleadings and orders.