[2022] KEELC 309 (KLR)

[2022] KEELC 309 (KLR)

The court found that the suit had been compromised by a consent judgment dated 8/5/2019, under which the applicants paid the agreed consideration for their respective portions of the suit property. The respondent failed to provide completion documents as required, and there was evidence suggesting she sought to use...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEELC 309 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Monica Jeruto Ruto; Defendant: Simon Ngugi; Defendant: Christopher Irungu; Defendant: Isaack Kioma; Defendant: Amos Mwangi (Representing Nicholas Mwangi); Defendant: Dennis Omondi; Defendant: Njoroge Kinyanjui; Defendant: Charles Mutisya; Defendant: Dennis Mokaya; Defendant: Charles Njuguna
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 39 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
EO Obaga
Legal Topics
Consent Judgment Enforcement, Specific Performance, Injunctive Relief, Transfer of Land Titles
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Consent Judgment Enforcement Specific Performance Injunctive Relief Transfer of Land Titles

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Monica Jeruto Ruto

Plaintiff

Simon Ngugi

Defendant

Christopher Irungu

Defendant

Isaack Kioma

Defendant

Amos Mwangi (Representing Nicholas Mwangi)

Defendant

Dennis Omondi

Defendant

Njoroge Kinyanjui

Defendant

Charles Mutisya

Defendant

Dennis Mokaya

Defendant

Charles Njuguna

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion / Ruling on Interlocutory Application

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff/respondent should be restrained from dealing with the suit property contrary to the consent judgment.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff/respondent has failed to comply with the consent judgment and decree by withholding completion documents.
  3. 3 Whether the Deputy Registrar should be empowered to execute documents to effect subdivision and transfer if the plaintiff/respondent fails to comply.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the suit had been compromised by a consent judgment dated 8/5/2019, under which the applicants paid the agreed consideration for their respective portions of the suit property. The respondent failed to provide completion documents as required, and there was evidence suggesting she sought to use the property as collateral for a loan, potentially prejudicing the applicants' interests. The court held that the applicants had demonstrated a clear right to enforcement of the consent judgment and to injunctive relief restraining the respondent from dealing with the property contrary to the consent. The court further held that, should the respondent fail to provide the...

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The respondent is restrained from selling, transferring, charging, pledging, leasing, or in any manner interfering with LR No Eldoret Municipality Block 15/1753 other than facilitating transfer of the respective portions to the applicants.
  • A notice to show cause is issued to the respondent to show cause why she should not be committed to civil jail for failure to honour the judgment entered herein.