[2015] KEHC 6119 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 6119 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant, Jane Susan Mbatha Kioko, was both an administratrix and a beneficiary of the estate but was omitted from the list of beneficiaries and excluded from the distribution of the estate during the confirmation of the grant. The court held that the failure to disclose her status and to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEHC 6119 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Monica Kanini; Applicant: Vincent Mutuku Seke; Respondent: Jane Susan Mbatha Kioko
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Machakos
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 54 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Revocation of Confirmed Grant
Outcome
confirmed grant revoked; parties to file fresh summons for confirmation including all beneficiaries
Judges
LN Mutende
Legal Topics
Succession, Revocation of Grant, Fraudulent Concealment, Distribution of Estate, Administration of Estate
Source Language
en
Family and Children Succession Revocation of Grant Fraudulent Concealment Distribution of Estate Administration of Estate

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Monica Kanini

Applicant

Vincent Mutuku Seke

Applicant

Jane Susan Mbatha Kioko

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Revocation of Confirmed Grant

  1. 1 Whether the confirmed grant was obtained fraudulently by concealment of material facts.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant was unlawfully excluded from the distribution of the estate.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant's consent was required and obtained for the confirmation of the grant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant, Jane Susan Mbatha Kioko, was both an administratrix and a beneficiary of the estate but was omitted from the list of beneficiaries and excluded from the distribution of the estate during the confirmation of the grant. The court held that the failure to disclose her status and to obtain her consent amounted to concealment of material facts and was contrary to the law. As such, the confirmed grant was obtained fraudulently and was liable to revocation under Section 76 of the Law of Succession Act. The court revoked the confirmed grant and directed that fresh summons for confirmation be filed to include all beneficiaries.

Court Disposition

confirmed grant revoked; parties to file fresh summons for confirmation including all beneficiaries

Orders

  • The confirmed grant is hereby revoked.
  • Parties are directed to file fresh summons for confirmation to include all beneficiaries.