[2014] KEHC 5224 (KLR)
The court determined that the issues raised by the applicants regarding entitlement to the estate of Joyce Kainda Maundu are intricately linked to the unresolved administration and distribution of the estate of Maundu Munyoki. Since two succession causes relating to Maundu Munyoki's estate are pending or unresolved,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] KEHC 5224 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Monica Minoo Maundu; Applicant: Paulina Ngoni Mwangangi; Respondent: Alex Musyoki Kithome; Respondent: Faith Mwende Kithome
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 1940 of 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Revocation of Grant
- Outcome
- Determination of the application for revocation of grant postponed pending production and consolidation of related court files.
- Judges
- DN Musyoka
- Legal Topics
- Revocation of Grant, Intestate Succession, Beneficiary Entitlement, Estate Administration
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Monica Minoo Maundu
Applicant
Paulina Ngoni Mwangangi
Applicant
Alex Musyoki Kithome
Respondent
Faith Mwende Kithome
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Revocation of Grant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants, as widow and daughter of Maundu Munyoki, should have been included as survivors and heirs in the administration of Joyce Kainda Maundu's estate.
- 2 Whether the property forming the estate of Joyce Kainda Maundu rightfully devolved to her or should be subject to claims from the estate of Maundu Munyoki.
- 3 Whether the grant of letters of administration intestate to Alex Musyoki Kithome and Faith Mwende Kithome should be revoked due to alleged non-disclosure of beneficiaries.
Ratio Decidendi
The court determined that the issues raised by the applicants regarding entitlement to the estate of Joyce Kainda Maundu are intricately linked to the unresolved administration and distribution of the estate of Maundu Munyoki. Since two succession causes relating to Maundu Munyoki's estate are pending or unresolved, and both parties have made extensive reference to those proceedings, the court found it could not fairly determine the application for revocation of grant without first reviewing the records and proceedings in Nairobi HCP&A No. 209 of 1968 and Nairobi HCSC No. 2895 of 2005. The court therefore postponed determination of the application pending production and consolidation of...
Court Disposition
Determination of the application for revocation of grant postponed pending production and consolidation of related court files.
Orders
- Determination of the application dated 2nd June 2011 is postponed pending production of the court files in Nairobi HCP&A No. 209 of 1968 and Nairobi HCSC No. 2895 of 2005.
- The two files shall be put together with the file in the instant cause and the matter mentioned on 28th May 2013.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 1940 OF 2008
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF KAINDA MAUNDU –(DECEASED)
RULING
The deceased, Joyce Kainda Maundu, died intestate on 3rd March 2006. Representation to her estate was sought and obtained by two of her surviving children, Alex Musyoki Kithome and Faith Mwende Kithome. A grant of letters of administration intestate was made to them on 24th November 2008.
According to the affidavit sworn in support of the petition for grant by the administrators, on 27th July 2008, the deceased was survived by seven (7) children- three sons and four daughters.
Confirmation of the said grant was sought on 30th June 2010 through an application dated 25th June 2010. The grant was confirmed on 31st January 2011 and the estate was shared out between one daughter and the three sons of the deceased. There is a certificate of confirmation of grant dated 31st January 2011.
On 2nd June 2011 a Summons for Revocation of grant was lodged in court, dated 26th May 2011, by Monica Minoo Maundu and Paulina Ngoni Mwangangi. Their case being that they ought to have been listed in the administrators’ petition as survivors and heirs of the deceased. They argue that the property forming the estate of Joyce Kainda Maundu, initially belonged to Maundu Munyoki. When the said Maundu Munyoki died in 1966 representation to his estate was given to his son, Jeremiah Kithome Maundu in 1968. The estate of Maundu Munyoki devolved upon the said Jeremiah Kithome Maundu. The said Jeremiah Kithome Maundu died in 1987. His widow, Joyce Kainda, moved the court with others and obtained representation to estate of Maundu Munyoki. The applicants herein state that Maundu Munyoki had three wives and devolution of his estate wholly upon Jeremiah Kithome Maundu meant that the other houses were deprived. The applicants herein are widow and daughter, respectively, of Maundu Munyoki. They claim a stake in the estate of Joyce Kainda Maundu under those circumstances, hence the instant application.
The administrators opposed the application, through an affidavit sworn on 13th January 2012 by Alex Munyoki Kithome. The said affidavit does not respond to the issues raised in the affidavits of the applicants.
The application was placed before Njagi J. on 28th February 2012, and was argued by counsel for the applicants and opposed by the first administrator, Alex Munyoki Kithome. Counsel for the applicants, Ms. Machuki, argued that the late Joyce Kaindi Maundu was one of the administrators of the estate of the late Maundu Munyoki in Nairobi HCSC No. 2895 of 2005. She argued that it was while so acting as administrator that he had the late Maundu Munyoki’s property transferred to her name. The said property, she argues, therefore does not form part of the estate of the late Joyce Kaindi Maundu.
In reply to those submissions, Mr. Alex Kithome Maundu stated that the estate of Maundu Munyoki was distributed, amongst the deceased’s two widows, one of whom was his father’s mother.
Ms. Maundu in rejoinder informed the court that HCSC No. 2895 of 2005 has not been confirmed as the applicant was contesting the administration in that cause.
From the material placed before me, it is clear that the instant cause, HCSC No. 1940 of 2008 is very intimately intertwined with the estate of Maundu Munyoki. I note that two succession causes were initiated at this registry relating to the estate of the said Maundu Munyoki – being Nairobi HCP&A No. 209 of 1968andNairobi HCSC No. 2895 of 2005. Both parties have made extensive references to the said estate. I feel I cannot do justice in this matter without first studying the proceedings in the two causes referrred to above.
The orders that I will make in the circumstances are:-
That the determination of the application dated 2nd June 2011 is hereby postponed pending the production of the court files in respect of Nairobi HCP&A No. 209 of 1968 and Nairobi HCSC No. 2895 of 2005;
That the two files mentioned above shall be put together with the file in the instant cause and the matter herein mentioned on 28th May 2013; and
That the Deputy Registrar is hereby directed to give effect to (b) above.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI this 16th DAY OF May, 2014.
W. MUSYOKA
JUDGE
In the presence of Mrs. Abong’o advocate for the applicant.