[2023] KEELC 17836 (KLR)

[2023] KEELC 17836 (KLR)

The court found that the defendants had been given sufficient notice and time to vacate the suit property, and that all legal avenues to remain on the land had been exhausted, including the rejection of their application for review. There were no stay orders in place. The court held that the plaintiff was entitled...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELC 17836 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: John Nyang’Au Monyenche; Defendant: Nyamusi Nyamboga; Defendant: Nackson Onyancha Momanyi; Defendant: Peris Kemunto Monyenye
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nyamira
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 35 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Application for Police Security to Enforce Eviction Order
Outcome
Application allowed. Police ordered to supervise eviction in accordance with the law.
Judges
JM Kamau
Legal Topics
Eviction Procedure, Enforcement of Judgments, Protection of Dignity, Police Assistance in Execution
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Eviction Procedure Enforcement of Judgments Protection of Dignity Police Assistance in Execution

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Nyang’Au Monyenche

Plaintiff

Nyamusi Nyamboga

Defendant

Nackson Onyancha Momanyi

Defendant

Peris Kemunto Monyenye

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Application for Police Security to Enforce Eviction Order

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to police assistance to enforce the eviction order against the defendants.
  2. 2 Whether the eviction should be carried out in accordance with constitutional and statutory safeguards for dignity and humane treatment.
  3. 3 Whether the pending application for review by the defendants operates as a stay of the eviction order.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the defendants had been given sufficient notice and time to vacate the suit property, and that all legal avenues to remain on the land had been exhausted, including the rejection of their application for review. There were no stay orders in place. The court held that the plaintiff was entitled to enforcement of the eviction order, but emphasized that the eviction must be conducted in strict compliance with constitutional and statutory requirements, particularly those safeguarding the dignity and humane treatment of the evictees. The court ordered the Officer Commanding Nyamira Police Station and the officer in charge of Nyamatoki Police Post to supervise the eviction...

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Police ordered to supervise eviction in accordance with the law.

Orders

  • The Officer Commanding Nyamira Police Station and the officer in charge of Nyamatoki Police Post are ordered to supervise the eviction in accordance with the Land Act and the Constitution.
  • The eviction must be carried out in a manner that respects the dignity and rights of the evictees, with special measures for vulnerable groups.