[2023] KEELC 21798 (KLR)

[2023] KEELC 21798 (KLR)

The court found that there are two competing titles to the suit property, with the plaintiff's title having been issued first. The plaintiff is in possession of the land and has demonstrated a prima facie case with a likelihood of success. The court held that if the plaintiff were evicted, he would likely suffer...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELC 21798 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Vijay Morjaria; Defendant: Paul Kibet Chebor; Defendant: Raymond Kibon Kurgor; Defendant: Joseph Sitienei Rotich; Defendant: Director Of Survey; Defendant: Land Registrar, Nakuru County; Defendant: Attorney General
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case E031 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction
Outcome
Temporary injunction granted pending hearing of the suit.
Judges
A Ombwayo
Legal Topics
Land Title Disputes, Fraudulent Registration, Injunctive Relief, Rectification of Register
Source Language
en
Land and Property Land Title Disputes Fraudulent Registration Injunctive Relief Rectification of Register

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Vijay Morjaria

Plaintiff

Paul Kibet Chebor

Defendant

Raymond Kibon Kurgor

Defendant

Joseph Sitienei Rotich

Defendant

Director Of Survey

Defendant

Land Registrar, Nakuru County

Defendant

Attorney General

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff has established a prima facie case for grant of a temporary injunction pending the hearing of the suit.
  2. 2 Whether the resurvey, amendment of the registry index map, and issuance of lease in respect of the suit property were tainted by fraud, illegality, and corruption.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff is likely to suffer irreparable loss if the injunction is not granted.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that there are two competing titles to the suit property, with the plaintiff's title having been issued first. The plaintiff is in possession of the land and has demonstrated a prima facie case with a likelihood of success. The court held that if the plaintiff were evicted, he would likely suffer irreparable loss that could not be adequately compensated by damages. The balance of convenience favored maintaining the status quo by preserving the plaintiff's possession of the property. Consequently, the court granted a temporary injunction restraining the defendants from entering, remaining, cultivating, or interfering with the suit property pending the hearing and...

Court Disposition

Temporary injunction granted pending hearing of the suit.

Orders

  • A temporary injunction is granted restraining the defendants from entering, remaining, cultivating, or interfering with Nakuru Municipality Block 17/308 pending the hearing and determination of the suit.
  • Costs in the suit.