[2022] KEELC 553 (KLR)

[2022] KEELC 553 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant failed to comply with its directions to file written submissions in support of the Notice of Motion dated 13/5/2020. There was no evidence that the dismissal order issued on 30/11/2020 had been set aside, varied, or appealed. As a result, there was no valid application before the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEELC 553 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Morrison M. Muriuki; Respondent: Lawrence Karugu Kimani; Respondent: Githunguri Constituency Ranching Company Limited
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Thika
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition 17 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Outcome
interlocutory application dismissed for want of prosecution
Judges
BC Koech
Legal Topics
Eviction Proceedings, Ownership Disputes, Fraudulent Transfer, Conservatory Orders
Source Language
en
Land and Property Constitutional Law Eviction Proceedings Ownership Disputes Fraudulent Transfer Conservatory Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Morrison M. Muriuki

Applicant

Lawrence Karugu Kimani

Respondent

Githunguri Constituency Ranching Company Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Interlocutory Application

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to conservatory orders restraining eviction from the suit properties pending hearing of the petition.
  2. 2 Whether the Notice of Motion dated 13/5/2020 should be dismissed for want of prosecution.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant failed to comply with its directions to file written submissions in support of the Notice of Motion dated 13/5/2020. There was no evidence that the dismissal order issued on 30/11/2020 had been set aside, varied, or appealed. As a result, there was no valid application before the court for determination. The court emphasized the importance of compliance with procedural directions and held that the application stood dismissed. The applicant was advised to fix the main petition for hearing expeditiously.

Court Disposition

interlocutory application dismissed for want of prosecution

Orders

  • The Notice of Motion dated 13/5/2020 stands dismissed.
  • The petitioner is at liberty to fix the petition for hearing expeditiously.