[2022] KEELC 1977 (KLR)

[2022] KEELC 1977 (KLR)

The court found that the reports previously filed by the Land Registrar and County Surveyor were inconclusive and did not provide a clear basis for determining the true boundary between the disputed parcels. Given the uncertainty and the possibility of boundary interference between 2003 and 2015, the court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEELC 1977 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Mose Omenda; Defendant: Jane Matara; Defendant: Duke Mogaka; Defendant: William Ongaga; Defendant: Nyauncho Nyakundi; Defendant: Seventh Day Adventist Church (E.A) Union Ltd; Defendant: Hon. Attorney General
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nyamira
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 10 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Land Dispute / Interlocutory Ruling on Boundary Determination and Site Visit
Outcome
Application allowed; fresh site visit and report ordered.
Judges
CM Kamau
Legal Topics
Boundary Disputes, Land Registration, Survey Reports, Encroachment, Court Mandated Site Visits
Source Language
en
Land and Property Boundary Disputes Land Registration Survey Reports Encroachment Court Mandated Site Visits

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mose Omenda

Plaintiff

Jane Matara

Defendant

Duke Mogaka

Defendant

William Ongaga

Defendant

Nyauncho Nyakundi

Defendant

Seventh Day Adventist Church (E.A) Union Ltd

Defendant

Hon. Attorney General

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land Dispute / Interlocutory Ruling on Boundary Determination and Site Visit

  1. 1 Whether the boundaries between L.R. NO. EAST KITUTU/BONYAMONDO 1/524 and L.R. NO. EAST KITUTU/BONYAMONDO 1/821 can be definitively established based on the available reports.
  2. 2 Whether either the plaintiff or the 5th defendant has encroached onto the other’s land and to what extent.
  3. 3 Whether a fresh site visit and report by the Land Registrar and County Surveyor is necessary for resolution.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the reports previously filed by the Land Registrar and County Surveyor were inconclusive and did not provide a clear basis for determining the true boundary between the disputed parcels. Given the uncertainty and the possibility of boundary interference between 2003 and 2015, the court determined that a fresh mandate should be given to the Land Registrar and County Surveyor to visit the suit premises, establish the true boundary, determine any encroachment, and file a comprehensive report. The court further ordered that both parties be allowed to attend the exercise, bring private surveyors if desired, and share the costs, with security provided by the OCS Sengera...

Court Disposition

Application allowed; fresh site visit and report ordered.

Orders

  • The Land Registrar and County Surveyor, Nyamira, are to visit the suit premises and determine who between the plaintiff and the 5th defendant has encroached onto the other’s land and to what extent.
  • They are to fix the boundaries between L.R. NO. EAST KITUTU/BONYAMONDO 1/524 and L.R. NO. EAST KITUTU/BONYAMONDO 1/821.