[2020] KECA 246 (KLR)
The Court of Appeal held that its jurisdiction to entertain an application for stay of execution under Rule 5(2)(b) is dependent on the prior filing of a Notice of Appeal as required by Rule 75. In the absence of a Notice of Appeal, the Court is devoid of jurisdiction to determine the application on its merits....
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KECA 246 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Moses Adero Otieno; Respondent: China Jiangxi International (K) Ltd
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Application 158 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- application struck out
- Judges
- J Karanja, MSA Makhandia
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Appellate Jurisdiction, Notice of Appeal Requirement
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Moses Adero Otieno
Applicant
China Jiangxi International (K) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court of Appeal has jurisdiction to grant a stay of execution in the absence of a Notice of Appeal.
- 2 Whether the applicant satisfied the procedural requirements for seeking a stay of execution under Rule 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal held that its jurisdiction to entertain an application for stay of execution under Rule 5(2)(b) is dependent on the prior filing of a Notice of Appeal as required by Rule 75. In the absence of a Notice of Appeal, the Court is devoid of jurisdiction to determine the application on its merits. Since the applicant failed to annex or demonstrate the existence of a Notice of Appeal, the application was incompetent and could not be entertained. The application was therefore struck out with costs to the respondent.
Court Disposition
application struck out
Orders
- The application is hereby struck out with costs to the respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
35 paragraphs
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
AT NAIROBI
(CORAM: KARANJA, MAKHANDIA & GATEMBU, JJ.A)
KISUMU CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 158 OF 2019
BETWEEN
MOSES ADERO OTIENO...........................................APPLICANT
AND
CHINA JIANGXI INTERNATIONAL (K) LTD..........RESPONDENT
(An application for stay of execution pending the hearing and determination
of the appeal from the judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Homa-Bay
(J. R. Karanjah) delivered on 9thApril, 2019inHCCA No. 14 of 2018)
*****************
RULING OF THE COURT
Moses Adero Otieno, (the applicant) has moved this Court by way of Notice of Motion dated 13th November, 2019 pronounced to be brought under Rule 5(2)b of the Rules of this Court (the rules) for orders, inter alia, that
“Pending the hearing and determination of the appeal from the judgment of the High Court (Justice J. R. Karanjah) siting in Homa-Bay delivered on 9thApril, 2019 this Honourable Court be pleased to issue an order of stay of execution in Homa-Bay Court Civil Appeal No. 14 of 2018 China Jiangxi International (K) Ltd vs. Moses Adero Otieno an order of injunction restraining the respondent and its employees, agents, servants or hirelings from executing the judgment and orders in the said HCCA No. 14 of 2018. ”
Although one of the grounds on the face of the application refers to a memorandum of appeal, there is no memorandum of appeal annexed to the application. More importantly, there is no Notice of Appeal annexed to the supporting affidavit to demonstrate that the applicant has filed an appeal before this Court. Even the index makes no reference to any Notice of Appeal. This Court derives its jurisdiction to entertain applications under Rule 5(2) b of its Rules from the Notice of Appeal filed pursuant to Rule 75 of the said Rules. Rule 5(2) b provides as here under:-
“5(2) subject to sub-rule (1) the institution of an appeal shall not operate to suspend any sentence or to stay execution, but the court may –
(b) In any civil proceedings, where a notice of appeal has been lodged in accordance with rule 75, order a stay of execution, an injunction or a stay of any further proceedings on such terms as the court may think just.”
On the other hand, Rule 75 provides as follows:-
(1) Any person who desires to appeal to the Court shall give notice in writing, which shall be lodged in duplicate with the registrar of the superior court.
(2) Every such notice shall, subject to rules 84 and 97, be so lodged within fourteen days of the date of the decision against which it is desired to appeal.
Inevitably therefore, in absence of a Notice of Appeal filed pursuant to the above Rule, this Court is devoid of jurisdiction to entertain this application and determine it on its merits. Accordingly, the application is hereby struck out with costs to the respondent.
Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 23rdday of October, 2020.
W. KARANJA
...............................................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
ASIKE – MAKHANDIA
..................................................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
S. GATEMBU KAIRU, FCIArb
...................................................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a true copy of the original.
Signed
DEPUTY REGISTRAR